What would be the best way to learn the notes in the following bars for someone who has REALLY small hands (can just reach an octave in both hands but their finger spread is quite slim) but is desperate to learn this piece... remembering this would be for an exam or performance and they are being assessed on. Would it be best (in an exam situation) to: a) Omit the thumb note in each of the chords in the RH and play it as smoothly as possible without that note or b) Roll the chord which is still quite awkward for them given the shape of some of the chords for their small handsLet me know... I've never dealt with a student with hands this small.
Me personally: I would have the student learn it both ways. It is much preferred to not leave these notes out, but it does not sound terrible if your suggested notes are omitted. I'm not sure how the exam judge or jury would feel about the missed notes. They will certainly notice them not being played.
I notice that the 4th finger is indicated for top note. Can they hit the chord using the 5th? (Of course, they'd have to lift the 5 over to the following eighth note - (note ideal)
My thinking is that the arpeggiation of the notes seems clunkier than the removal of a single note in each chord... plus given the actual chords themselves - I don't think most examiners would actually notice if they were missing; because of the tight cluster of notes up the top (the C-Eb-F) and the fact that there is still a high F in the chord - I don't think most examiners would notice the missing lower F. I think if you took out any other single note - it would be more identifiable... Also, my student is trying to do her Masters in Psychology, but loves doing Piano as a hobby but doesn't have as much practice time as she'd like - so it would probably be preferable to get her practising one way and committing to it. In a perfect world with lots of practice time - I'd definitely agree with trying both ways. I have small hands (not that small though) and I can play the full chord, but even I think arpeggiating it just takes away from the simplicity of the passage to me. Thoughts?
"Thought of that as well, but this would break the slur... to me that sounds like a 'no-no'."Yes, the slur. I was thinking she might just use the pedal at that spot.. but if no pedal is being used for the piece, it would be too obvious I suppose. So, in that case, I agree, and have her drop the low note.
Pedal is completely fine.If this is for examinations choose a piece which fits the hands appropriately some examiners really don't take the hand size into any consideration.
The choice outside of the grade books is quite large if you check the syllabus.
I think in my head - the use of 5 for the whole chord as written can be done, but you're essentially having to lift the 5 finger multiple times in succession - lifting off the single note to get to the chord, and lifting again to get to the single note above before trying to finish the final chord in the slur.
Yes, I know there is a whole manual list of pieces, but I don't think she has the time and energy going through them all.
It's going to be indiscernible maintaining the legato with the pedal and using the 5 will be the easiest physically for her thus improving the control and sound. When finding selections usually I would present options to the student without playing every single option. You can guage their taste and physical capabilities and reduce what is considered.
Also, the student is an adult - they've ALWAYS been the sort of person who has chosen their repertoire and come to me wanting to learn it. Given they genuinely wanted to learn this as their own choosing - it seemed inappropriate to tell them to try and limit their repertoire to their physical capabilities.
I think the piece works fine with pedalling, playing it without pedal throughout would be a little odd based on its style.
I didn't mean that... I just don't think every single beat or almost every single note needs to have pedal.