Piano Forum

Pages: [1] Go Down

Topic: Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher? (Read 939 times)

musicalpenguin

PS Silver Member
Newbie
Posts: 4

Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher?

on: July 25, 2025, 09:01:06 PM

Hello everyone, I've recently picked up piano playing after a 20 year hiatus, and I'm loving it so much that I'm practicing 2-3 hours a day. I was wondering if I can learn to play the advanced pieces that require various techniques by practicing them myself, or if I should try to look for a piano teacher. My history with piano:
- took piano lessons from age 5-8 in South Korea
- performed Mozart's Rondo Alla Turca during this time
- immigrated to US, had very little piano lessons
- auditioned and got into a music program in college where I learned a few of Mozart sonatas and performed them including Sonata 13 and 14a.
- stopped for 20 years because I had no access to a piano.

I have no idea what my current level is, but I enjoyed learning Beethoven's Pathetique 1st movement which took about 3 days but needs a ton of polishing. I also finished learning Tempest 3rd movement (technically more difficult than Pathetique 1st I feel). There are so many music pieces I have on my goal list, including Waldstein sonata, Appasionata sonata, Chopin's Etudes and Ballades, Chopin's fantasie impromptu, and many others.

The technique issue came to mind because I'm tacking Moonlight sonata 3rd movement, and it's been very difficult. I'm not used to playing music in C sharp minor, and it takes time to read the notes and also to be able to play each passage. For this piece for example, if I keep at it and do exercises from czerney, clementi, hanon, etc - would I be able to play decently with the required techniques? How do you get to that level?

Logged

dizzyfingers

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 303

Re: Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher?

Reply #1 on: July 26, 2025, 12:33:27 AM

That's a good question.

It should be obvious that things will go better with a skilled teacher, preferably one with a proven track record (students successfully auditioning for music schools).
If for some reason an in-person teacher is not available, I would consider online instruction, even subscribing to the pre-packaged courses, like this one:

https://pianoskillsandmagic.teachable.com

.. so that you learn the fundamentals correctly and avoid bad habits.

Another, more interactive piano learning community:

https://www.aaronpetitpiano.com/keylearnerspianoclub

You can go ahead on your own, sounds like you will have success in learning music. How well you play these pieces is another matter. We can't tell without recordings.

Logged

lostinidlewonder

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 8147

Re: Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher?

Reply #2 on: July 26, 2025, 07:50:47 AM

The simple answer is yes, but curiously those who ask generally require a teacher. If you are an autodidact you generally feel quite confident in being able to internalize and improve upon technique yourself perhaps with a few guiding pointers found in words or in video/audio. Generally a piano autodidact would want to insulate themselves completely or at least curate exactly what info they expose themselves to. They solve as much as they can before asking questions, and in fact many traditional ideologies might be something very difficult for them to accept if it doesn't fall in line with their successful experimentation experiences.

So the fact you are asking questions tends towards you needing a teacher to bounce ideas off. Asking random info from a forum isn't generally what autodidacts look for.

Logged

"The biggest risk in life is to take no risk at all."
www.pianovision.com

ranjit

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1462

Re: Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher?

Reply #3 on: July 26, 2025, 08:39:09 PM

Quote from: lostinidlewonder on July 26, 2025, 07:50:47 AM

The simple answer is yes, but curiously those who ask generally require a teacher. If you are an autodidact you generally feel quite confident in being able to internalize and improve upon technique yourself perhaps with a few guiding pointers found in words or in video/audio. Generally a piano autodidact would want to insulate themselves completely or at least curate exactly what info they expose themselves to. They solve as much as they can before asking questions, and in fact many traditional ideologies might be something very difficult for them to accept if it doesn't fall in line with their successful experimentation experiences.

This is a very interesting observation. I've also followed this pattern without realizing it -- it feels like those who trust themselves to learn new things quickly and accurately just do so, curate the information they get, and then ask specific questions right off the bat.

I believe my questions at the starting were more along the lines of: Why can't you play scales at 200bpm within a year? You can isolate scale movements into groups of 3s and 4s generally, and it's not that difficult to wiggle your fingers at a very fast speed. There seem to be a very small number of possible motions in a very constrained problem space, which you should be able to train yourself to do, etc.

I think autodidacts tend not to ask and just do to begin with -- with a caveat. The caveat is that it seems like imposter syndrome is prevalent among them as well. So it isn't true that an autodidact wouldn't generally ask if it's possible to learn technique on their own because they are unsure whether their line of approach will bear fruit. But I have to agree with liw here overall -- that has been my observation as well.

Furthermore, it's interesting how many of them end up being drawn to the same resources. I've met several people who attempted to teach themselves from C Chang's book.

Logged

https://www.youtube.com/@blizzardpiano

musicalpenguin

PS Silver Member
Newbie
Posts: 4

Re: Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher?

Reply #4 on: July 26, 2025, 09:01:32 PM

Quote from: ranjit on July 26, 2025, 08:39:09 PM

Furthermore, it's interesting how many of them end up being drawn to the same resources. I've met several people who attempted to teach themselves from C Chang's book.

Thank you to all who have left insightful comments on this question, I really appreciate it. I just chuckled at this comment as another person who bought C Chang's book for this purpose.

Logged

lostinidlewonder

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 8147

Re: Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher?

Reply #5 on: July 27, 2025, 12:14:56 PM

Quote from: ranjit on July 26, 2025, 08:39:09 PM

So it isn't true that an autodidact wouldn't generally ask if it's possible to learn technique on their own because they are unsure whether their line of approach will bear fruit.

I guess if they get to a point where there isn't anything else to progress on or they don't know how to solve something then they will naturally seek more direct external information. Autodidacts tend to treat external input as a tool not a starting point

From what I have experienced, unwanted outside information can often be interrupting and irritating to the autodidact who is more confident solving something on their own. This doesn't mean they're arrogant it means their cognitive process is self-motivated and they value internal understanding over external authority. The autodidact can actually see you as an adversary if you don’t respect the way they’re processing and learning on their own. You don’t do them any service by trying to redirect their approach, in fact, you risk alienating them and yourself in the teaching process if you do that. They much prefer if you walk beside them and scrutinize their approach, but only when they feel their progress has stalled. Getting in the way before that does no good for the teaching situation.

When an autodidact feels like they’ve solved something or are well on the way to doing so, they often can share their approach with others since it is a topic of great interest for them. This isn’t usually because they want advice, but more because they’re interested in what others think, kind of a celebration of their success and the path they’ve taken. It’s a way to reaffirm that their learning approach works. Sharing like this also helps them feel less like an imposter. If others resonate with their ideas, it provides some social validation that their way of learning is valid.

I have taught a few who preferred if I commented on their experimentations rather than suggest alternative approaches and it has been quite interesting that through critiquing their approach and highlighting its limitations, they often find better alternative pathways themselves. So the distinction between critique and redirection is important, autodidacts dislike unsolicited redirection and prefer critique focused on their own approach.

I'd say the vast majority of excellent pianists (and I could really argue that ALL) are autodidacts to some extent. I think everyone who learns the piano must experiment and iterate ideas given to them through the lens of their own understanding, we even find situations where we must actually come up with a personal solution that might be a tangent from the solution suggested to us. That’s a normal part of piano learning and learning in general I believe. Complete autodidacts however take this to an extreme.

Logged

"The biggest risk in life is to take no risk at all."
www.pianovision.com

dizzyfingers

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 303

Re: Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher?

Reply #6 on: July 28, 2025, 01:19:35 PM

Quote from: musicalpenguin on July 25, 2025, 09:01:06 PM

Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher?

In a word, "Yes", but it requires a good deal of talent, intelligence and organized focus.

Logged

brogers70

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1776

Re: Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher?

Reply #7 on: July 28, 2025, 11:57:53 PM

Quote from: lostinidlewonder on July 27, 2025, 12:14:56 PM

I guess if they get to a point where there isn't anything else to progress on or they don't know how to solve something then they will naturally seek more direct external information. Autodidacts tend to treat external input as a tool not a starting point

From what I have experienced, unwanted outside information can often be interrupting and irritating to the autodidact who is more confident solving something on their own. This doesn't mean they're arrogant it means their cognitive process is self-motivated and they value internal understanding over external authority. The autodidact can actually see you as an adversary if you don’t respect the way they’re processing and learning on their own. You don’t do them any service by trying to redirect their approach, in fact, you risk alienating them and yourself in the teaching process if you do that. They much prefer if you walk beside them and scrutinize their approach, but only when they feel their progress has stalled. Getting in the way before that does no good for the teaching situation.

When an autodidact feels like they’ve solved something or are well on the way to doing so, they often can share their approach with others since it is a topic of great interest for them. This isn’t usually because they want advice, but more because they’re interested in what others think, kind of a celebration of their success and the path they’ve taken. It’s a way to reaffirm that their learning approach works. Sharing like this also helps them feel less like an imposter. If others resonate with their ideas, it provides some social validation that their way of learning is valid.

I have taught a few who preferred if I commented on their experimentations rather than suggest alternative approaches and it has been quite interesting that through critiquing their approach and highlighting its limitations, they often find better alternative pathways themselves. So the distinction between critique and redirection is important, autodidacts dislike unsolicited redirection and prefer critique focused on their own approach.

I'd say the vast majority of excellent pianists (and I could really argue that ALL) are autodidacts to some extent. I think everyone who learns the piano must experiment and iterate ideas given to them through the lens of their own understanding, we even find situations where we must actually come up with a personal solution that might be a tangent from the solution suggested to us. That’s a normal part of piano learning and learning in general I believe. Complete autodidacts however take this to an extreme.

I love this post. Once upon a time my teacher complained to me, saying something like this "Whenever I tell you to do something, you ask a bunch of questions as though I'm not making sense, then you go home, and at the next lesson you come back and say you're doing something that sounds a lot like what I suggested but expressed completely differently." To her that was a problem, to me it is just how I learn, take input, question it, chew on it for a while, translate it into language that makes sense to me, and then work with it. She knew a lot about the piano, but I'd spent years teaching myself all sorts of things, a bunch of foreign languages, mathematics, epidemiology, and I was an expert on how I learn. She was very helpful for some years, but after a while the difference in how she wanted to teach and how I wanted to learn ended up being too big, and we split up. I really think the things you learn solidly are the things you've worked to figure out for yourself; hints and tips from a good teacher are great, but you have to do the work yourself.

Logged

lostinidlewonder

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 8147

Re: Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher?

Reply #8 on: July 29, 2025, 05:50:50 AM

Quote from: brogers70 on July 28, 2025, 11:57:53 PM

I love this post.

I'm glad it resonated with you, I think many autodidacts can feel very misunderstood which is a shame and doesn't help with that feeling of isolation that they really shouldn't feel but is quite the nature of how they work.

Quote from: brogers70 on July 28, 2025, 11:57:53 PM

Once upon a time my teacher complained to me, saying something like this "Whenever I tell you to do something, you ask a bunch of questions as though I'm not making sense, then you go home, and at the next lesson you come back and say you're doing something that sounds a lot like what I suggested but expressed completely differently." To her that was a problem, to me it is just how I learn, take input, question it, chew on it for a while, translate it into language that makes sense to me, and then work with it.

When I was a younger teacher that's exactly how I felt too. Why is this student questioning what is to me an obvious improvement to their approach! It felt like they didn't believe just like you said what your teacher felt. I never verbalized that to my first student who was like that because I always avoided negative feedback in lessons that wouldn't help a situation. I meditated upon it and it really didn't take long to realize it wasn't dissidence but rather an essential part of how they learned and processed.

Sometimes their questioning pushed against my ideas, but instead of forcing the issue, I let them demonstrate their approach which often turned out to be elegant and well suited to their level. I have never been a teacher who demands things be "correct" all the time and really do encourage those iterations toward "perfection", I really believe there is so much to learn from what process and is a key part of my teaching philosophy.

Quote from: brogers70 on July 28, 2025, 11:57:53 PM

She knew a lot about the piano, but I'd spent years teaching myself all sorts of things, a bunch of foreign languages, mathematics, epidemiology, and I was an expert on how I learn. She was very helpful for some years, but after a while the difference in how she wanted to teach and how I wanted to learn ended up being too big, and we split up. I really think the things you learn solidly are the things you've worked to figure out for yourself; hints and tips from a good teacher are great, but you have to do the work yourself.

Yeah it's unfortunately a common situation that teachers do not have that more understanding teaching philosophy that accepts the various ways in which people process information and actively make changes to their approach depending upon what kind of student they are dealing for a given topic. It's something I touched on in the past here: https://www.pianostreet.com/smf/index.php?topic=41550.

It is really important that a student express things to their teacher like you did in your post, that you self learned many other topics, it really gives valuable insight into how the student learns. I always make it a point to get to know about a student’s interests and activities outside of piano. That can reveal useful insights into how they think and stay motivated and shapes how I interact with them in lessons, often opening up more effective teaching strategies.

I personally believe that any failure in lessons is ultimately the teacher’s responsibility. If we were perfect teachers then every student would reach their highest potential with us. Of course perfection is impossible but if a teacher doesn’t hold themselves accountable for everything that happens in a lesson they’ll never become the best teacher they can be.

I’ve improved far more by examining my failures than by celebrating my successes. That’s why I believe students should never feel guilty when a learning situation falls short of their hopes. Yes students can be lazy or unmotivated but then the question becomes "Why didn’t the teacher find a way to help them engage?" It might sound harsh toward the teacher but I believe that’s the duty of any teacher who truly wants to be the best they can be.

We do have to be wary though that practically all autodidacts really do need help to maintain "honesty" about their limitations, gaps in knowledge or that sense of stubborness. So it is not always that the student is perfect and teachers can take a chisel out on that one!

I guess my main point in all of this is that autodidacts can paradoxically do extremely well with a teacher, I've seen it happen in lessons of my own and through my own experiences as a student being autodidactic myself. But it requires a teacher who’s sensitive to the different ways people process information and unfortunately that kind of awareness is still too rare.

I realize this has turned into quite a wall of text but I hope it reflects how deeply I care about this topic and more importantly that it offers something of interest or value to those reading.

Logged

"The biggest risk in life is to take no risk at all."
www.pianovision.com

lelle

PS Gold Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 2554

Re: Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher?

Reply #9 on: July 29, 2025, 08:37:29 AM

Quote from: musicalpenguin on July 25, 2025, 09:01:06 PM

The technique issue came to mind because I'm tacking Moonlight sonata 3rd movement, and it's been very difficult. I'm not used to playing music in C sharp minor, and it takes time to read the notes and also to be able to play each passage. For this piece for example, if I keep at it and do exercises from czerney, clementi, hanon, etc - would I be able to play decently with the required techniques? How do you get to that level?

Doing exercises does in no way guarantee that you'll develop the necessary technique. Playing the notes in an exercise does not in itself teach you how to play. You might, through intuition, figure out how to improve, if you are lucky. But you might also develop and ingrain bad habits because you just don't know what you don't know, especially in something as complex as playing the piano. To develop, you need to both practice a certain quantity of material and know what you are trying to develop - or be intuitively very gifted and talented for the specfic physical skills needed, which is rare.

The easiest way to go about this is finding a competent teacher.

Logged

ted

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 4022

Re: Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher?

Reply #10 on: July 29, 2025, 10:26:29 AM

I have too little experience to answer the general question but in regard to myself, and being scrupulously honest, I am certain I wouldn't be playing and creating as I am now had I not met and studied in my youth with Llewelyn Jones (no relation), the New Zealand pianist and composer. I assume that "advanced piano technique" extends beyond the physical aspect and also covers the mental and creative techniques. He actually never taught me any physical technique at all that I can remember, not a scrap, but his ability to nurture my creative drive while never attempting to harness it or mould me after his own fashion still strikes me as remarkable to this day. So despite a certain wish that I might have done it all myself I really doubt I could have.

Logged

"Mistakes are the portals of discovery." - James Joyce

essence

PS Silver Member
Full Member
Posts: 246

Re: Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher?

Reply #11 on: July 29, 2025, 07:15:48 PM

Good teachers teach you how to listen?

Logged

pseudonym

PS Silver Member
Newbie
Posts: 1

Re: Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher?

Reply #12 on: Yesterday at 02:38:54 AM

There's also a significant difference between a pianist or teacher whom you might approach for some lessons, and the notion that you are a long-term pupil of that person. I am an amateur pianist, so I really shouldn't offer advice about that instrument. But as a professional cellist, I have been approached by advanced players for lessons (judging by the repertoire you mention, I would say that you sound like a fairly advanced player yourself). I usually reply "I'll be happy to teach you what works for me, but we don't have to plan for long-term instruction". As a teacher, I should be able to impart pretty quickly the various techniques I use and how to approach common problems. I was always happy if they took a couple of lessons and learned something that was valuable to them.
For myself, the instruction from which I gained the most benefit was having to play solos in opera and symphony orchestras, where a somewhat different physical technique was required in order to be heard. I would sometimes get some tips from one or more of my colleagues. In a sense it's the ability to learn from experience and from others; combine those two sources of information and synthesize something that works for you.
That's my opinion, anyway.

Logged

dizzyfingers

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 303

Re: Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher?

Reply #13 on: Yesterday at 01:56:59 PM

Quote from: pseudonym on Yesterday at 02:38:54 AM

... As a teacher, I should be able to impart pretty quickly the various techniques I use and how to approach common problems. I was always happy if they took a couple of lessons and learned something that was valuable to them.

Good points.
Professional career teachers are okay for kids and adult beginners-->intermediate, but if you're an intelligent adult you should be able to guide yourself through the learning process, there's a lot of resources available now. The 5 session teacher is ideal : review your playing and give you some tips, impart what they know.

I think career teachers actually hold their students back because they unconsciously foster a dependent relationship. To really grow in music you have to venture out on your own and explore various options and resources. If you need someone to keep you focused, well that's just you I guess.

Logged

lostinidlewonder

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 8147

Re: Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher?

Reply #14 on: Yesterday at 05:41:28 PM

It’s simply not possible to impart complete knowledge of piano education in a short space of time, even with advanced pianists. Achieving true mastery is a long term process, it’s not like you can just upload all the information into a brain like a robot. People process information differently and the transfer is never perfect due to both the student’s limitations and the teacher’s effectiveness. Also advanced pianists DO benefit from teachers just as professional sportsmen/women benefit from a coach.

You can get a great tip that clicks immediately, sure that happens. But then what? You still have to actually integrate it into your playing, work through how it applies to different pieces, figure out what goes wrong when you try to use it. The real learning happens in all that messy work afterward not in the moment someone shows you something new. And that's where ongoing guidance really helps, not just for the initial insight but for all the variety of different problems that come up for the individual when they are actually trying to make it part of their playing. Most people need that kind of support over time not just the occasional lightbulb moment.

Having a teacher guide you in practice methods is generally quite necessary. It is not always something someone can do completely on their own. (Even some teachers might benefit from learning more efficient or varied practice methods!) The same applies to improving sight-reading.

All of this, practice methods, sight-reading, technical development and repertoire represents decades of study for practically everyone who wants to reach the highest levels. Even then not everyone may achieve or desire those levels as people have different limitations/goals. Of course most pianists are quite happy at various lower levels. A teacher can help guide you through this journey making it more efficient and enjoyable and responding to a teacher provides a huge boost to motivation, persistence, and consistency.

Quote from: dizzyfingers on Yesterday at 01:56:59 PM

I think career teachers actually hold their students back because they unconsciously foster a dependent relationship. To really grow in music you have to venture out on your own and explore various options and resources. If you need someone to keep you focused, well that's just you I guess.

This to me is a marginalized perspective so much so it's fair to call it misleading. If you are talking about terrible teachers sure, but I don't think constitutes the majority and certainly the vast majority of teachers aim to improve their students as best they can not create an environment of dependence.

In a perfect world where all students are programable and perfectly understand everything taught to them in a perfect way, sure, like a robot you can just copy paste ideas of mastery and its done and dusted. If one has any practical teaching experience however you will find this is 100% not the case and students develop over time. Sure there is an amount of experimentation that everyone goes through but many do appreciate guidance to save time and that is exactly what teachers do, they save you time. We as humans generally don't live very long so saving time helps a lot to reach your potential. Of course if you are an autodidact things change but most people are not, and even autodidacts benefit from some guidance too.

Logged

"The biggest risk in life is to take no risk at all."
www.pianovision.com

Sign-up to post reply

Pages: [1] Go Up

For more information about this topic, click search below!

Piano Street Magazine:
New Piano Piece by Chopin Discovered – Free Piano Score

A previously unknown manuscript by Frédéric Chopin has been discovered at New York’s Morgan Library and Museum. The handwritten score is titled “Valse” and consists of 24 bars of music in the key of A minor and is considered a major discovery in the wold of classical piano music. Read more

Piano Forum

Topic: Can you learn advanced piano techniques without a teacher? (Read 939 times)

Piano Street Magazine:New Piano Piece by Chopin Discovered – Free Piano Score

Piano Street Magazine:
New Piano Piece by Chopin Discovered – Free Piano Score