Brahms 1, 2Beethoven allRachmaninoff 2, 3, can we count rhapsody on theme paganini??Chopin 1, 2Liszt 1Tchaikovsky 1Schumann
Mine would definitely be the ALL the Rachmaninov's! even number four, work with me guys, the fourth is absolutely STUNNING!
I will be performing Brahms 2 in a coupla weeks, so naturally that's gonna come top of my list...though I'm gonna be holdin a grudge against it for some time for nearly driving me insane trying to learn it!!!
Pianoman1984, just remember that Brahms Op. 83 is one of the greatest artistic achievements ever penned by man ......... You should, therefore, rejoice in all of its challenges ....... and rewards ......... !
I almost agree ....... but I don't think Brahms has any duds (really!!). I don't think Mahler does either.
I will be performing Brahms 2 in a coupla weeks, so naturally that's gonna come top of my list...though I'm gonna be holdin a grudge against it for some time for nearly driving me insane trying to learn it!!! Rach 2 is also pretty high on the list - yes... I know it's a cliche..but think...it must be pretty incredible to command the love of so many people! However...a real fave (and my next to learn, coincidentally!) is the Barber Concerto - absolutely sublime!
I have a DVD of Pollini performing it with Abbado and the Wiener Philharmoniker. Absolutely incredible. So many notes.
Brahms:- Sarabande in A minor for piano. - Most of his organ works. Brahms just wasn't an organ man.- He wrote a substantial amount of songs; many have fallen by the wayside.- Many dislike his piano sonatas (though I happen to like them).
I have a DVD of Zimerman performing it with Bernstein and the Vienna PO -- beyond incredible (although Zimerman does make one small mistake in the 1st mvt ....... but I've since forgiven him .......) And as a bonus, it's coupled with the only piano concerto that is arguably greater than Brahms 2 --- ta da: Brahms 1 !!!
...... but who among us can judge a good song from a bad one ?
Well considering the subject at hand is "duds," I think that arguments are bound to be just a little opinionated, don't you think? It's also poor form to fall back on that defense -- to just say, "oh, well, we can't really tell." I mean, I've been in one or more chorus ensembles for the past eight years. Am I qualified? Oh wait -- who among us can judge who's a good judge? Right. Good job.
Hold on, there:Brahms piano sonatas are excellent, and his 3rd sonata is a top-tier masterpiece. Even his 1st piano sonata, op. 1, is very good IMO.Brahms wrote over 200 songs, and I'm sure some of them have seen better days ...... but who among us can judge a good song from a bad one ?What little Brahms wrote for the organ is highly regarded. Granted, Brahms was no JS Bach or Cesar Franck, but he was darn good. I know several organists who think Brahms organ music is just fine.I don't know the sarabande, however.
I love the Brahms Sonatas too - I reckon they're excellent works.And he's considered one of the Top 3 Lieder composers (with Schubert and Schumann).
Hmm, I'm not sure...I'm going with the quote I read that "the relationship of Brahms 1 to Brahms 2 is that of an adolesant to an adult." Also, I have not yet heard a Liverecording that doesn't contain a mistake of some sort. I'm glad you've found it within yourself to forgive him! I have to say my personal favourite recording of this is by Julius Katchen (can't recall the orchestra/conducter)....btw, has anyone ever heard or seen a performance of anything conducted by James Judd? He will conducting for me next week and I'm curious to hear what he's like!
Mozart 20, 23, 25
(Oh and one very guilty pleasure... Saint-Saens 1. I know flame me, but I love it!)
Pianomann, you bring up two very important points:1. Brahms 1 viz. Brahms 2. I'm confident that I'm in the minority when I say this, but Brahms 1 is EVERY BIT AS GREAT as Brahms 2 -- and I'm dead serious. Not to mention that Brahms 1 is performed more frequently in piano competitions ....... that its integrated motivic structure surpasses all concerti, save perhaps Beethoven 4 (and I'm being very generous to Beethoven 4) ........ that Brahms 1 flows more naturally (and without noticable gaps, transitions, or pauses) ........ It is a complete mischaracterization to declare that Brahms 1 was a mere adolescent visage of Brahms 2. 2. Julius Katchen is also on my very, very short list of outstanding recordings of both Brahms concerti ......
I must sayt that since posting this I took it upon my self to read through and tackle Brahms 1 as a little (!) side project, and would now agree with you from a performers point of view that it is extremely well constructed and by no means inferior. However there is no denying that Brahms 1 & 2 are a world apart - the 'adolescent' is by no means any less exciting, but it doesn't have the same sense of grandeur and structure across all 4 movements as the 'elder' - The D minor is more virtuosic/soloistic, and the Bb is more about chamber/symphonic playing (despite it's size, where chamber may be considered a bit of a contradiction!!!). I still maintain that Brahms 1 is younger-feeling and more firey, and that Brahms 2 trenscends with the age & wisdom of so many more years. (I can't believe that I made that up!!! )
My favourites:-Rach 2Gershwin in F minor
The Gershwin is in F Major!
what?
Schumann