Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All composers
All pieces
Search pieces
Recommended Pieces
Audiovisual Study Tool
Instructive Editions
Recordings
PS Editions
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Repertoire
»
WTC Bk. I, P&F in A minor
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: WTC Bk. I, P&F in A minor
(Read 1151 times)
dementedchord
PS Silver Member
Newbie
Posts: 2
WTC Bk. I, P&F in A minor
on: July 06, 2005, 03:07:01 PM
Hi,
Anyone played or analyzed this one before? I'm pretty sure I want to do it, and I've been trying to analyze it and running into difficulties. Any remarks anyone has on this piece would be greatly appreciated.
Logged
mlsmithz
PS Silver Member
Full Member
Posts: 182
Re: WTC Bk. I, P&F in A minor
Reply #1 on: July 06, 2005, 05:32:55 PM
Well, I've analysed the fugue from a musicological perspective but never a performer's perspective; I suspect you're more interested in the latter if you're trying to learn it for performance purposes. All I can say is that while Gulda's bouncy,
staccatissimo
rendition does make me smirk, it shouldn't be played too staccato, and there's no real agreement on tempo - among the recordings, Joerg Demus and Gustav Leonhardt opt for around 66 beats/minute, while Friedrich Gulda, Ralph Kirkpatrick, Wanda Landowska, and Sviatoslav Richter hover at or slightly above the 80 beats/minute mark, and then Glenn "Certifiably Insane" Gould takes it at over 100 beats/minute. (No offence to fans of the crazy Canadian but he had some frankly bizarre ideas about tempi and articulation in Bach; I suppose you either love them or you don't, and sometimes I do and sometimes I don't.) The ideal is probably somewhere between 63 and 72 beats/minute, but there's plenty of latitude - whatever sounds optimal to you. There's also no real agreement on subject articulation; no two renditions are alike, so play through it until you find an articulation you can fit into the stretto passages without too much difficulty. Just like any Bach harpsichord fugue.
As for the prelude, again there's no strong agreement on tempo (there never is in Bach, really) - Kirkpatrick and Landowska take it at around 63 beats (beat=dotted crochet/quarter note) per minute, while Gould, Gulda, Leonhardt, and Rosalyn Tureck play it around 76 beats/minute, and Richter blazes through at 92 beats/minute. Most of the published editions indicate something between 80 and 88, but, again, just choose a speed you think sounds optimal.
Such 'big picture' remarks are probably of little value, but I suppose they're a starting point if nothing else. This is quite possibly the most difficult piece in Book I, so best of luck to you!
Logged
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up