I got Yundi Li's CD and the more I listen to it, I am not finding much I don't like about it.
i think both are them are equavelent good. Sometimes i find that Rubinstein's recording are more mature maybe because of his experience of life i think. On the other hand, Yundi's Chopin is much more younger and innocent, he shows Chopin's ripe and young ages. Anyway i like both of them, one is sweet another is bitter sweet.
Thats so not what music is about. It's more about finding things you do like and cant imagine the music being without. Artur Rubinstein has the most amazing sincerity in his playing that perhaps no living pianist today can match.....imho!
i wouldn't say 'honest' to describe rubinstein's chopin...i like yundi li's chopin cd very much (except sonata no 3 1st mvt). but honestly, what happened since 2001? 4 years, and still nothing but chopin and liszt?? he studied in germany all these while, but why nothing of beethoven, bach in his repertoire? now he's going to russia i heard, wonder what he's up to...
Agreed. He's gotta be a little more versatile. Especially with some real core repertoire. I'd love to hear some Well Tempered Clavier or French Suites from him, or some Beethoven sonatas.
Yundi Li once claim that that is no hurry for him to play other composers yet. He would rather polish up all his Chopin first. P.S. I wouldn't mind if I can only play Chopin but not other composers.
I am interested in how he would interpret Rachmaninoff.I have a feeling it would be either excellent or mediocre.
No, he's working on beating Cziffra's octaves and developing the world's fastest 1-3 chromatics... oh yeah, and performing the Chopin Piano Concerto #1 with a huge memory slip in the second movement.
I prefer Rubinstein.Yundi is good, very good. But, I always get the feeling that he tries too much to please in his playing, to the point that it feels superficial.
there's no way Yundi's octaves can match up to Horowitz's.Or Gilels', Cziffra is a possibility.But seriously, Horowitz looked like he was spazzing when he did octaves! That's how fast they were. And accurate.And to be honest, I think that the speed taken could only be achieved by using only 5 on all notes in the octave.I know Horowitz didn't use 4, I'm not sure about Gilels, but if Gilels also used all 5, then that would make my point pretty evident.Yundi uses 4.
True. Rubinstein was so relaxed at the piano. He looked like he was playing because he loved the music.He never looks like he is trying to impress. Maybe when you become a master you can fake the sincerity but he really looked like he was playing it for the sake of making beautiful music, not to be known as the best. Maybe that's why he was considered one of the best because he didn't give the impression that's what he wanted.
sorry to say that i think cziffra´s octave can match or even better than horowitzlisten his transcriptions esp.flight of bumblebee
are you serious? the exact opposite is true, every famous piansit uses 4 and 5yundi is the only one who always uses 5, and thats one of the most astonishing things about him.also bear in mind people, that yundi is only 22 or so, he has plenty time to mature, when rubinstein was that age, it was 1908...the recordings we hear of him are in his later life, its hard to judge fairly
You've got to be kidding.First of all, the bumblebee octaves are played Broken, they are not real octaves. One hand takes each note. This is why it doesn't sound extremely dense in lower bass or higher treble.Second of all, Volodos plays that transcription faster than Cziffra does.Thirdly, Horowitz was the king of octaves. Period. If he wanted to, he could slaughter anybody with pretty much any octave passage. This was undeniable, and I'm starting to believe that no one who uses 4 on black keys could take him (like Cziffra). The two fastest octave recording of the Tchaik 1 belong to Horowitz, and Gilels, who both used 5 on all octaves.
Cziffra's video performing Liszt's "Grand Galop Chromatique" is one of the most jaw-dropping experiences I've had in my life.However, none can beat Horowitz as long as octaves are concerned. If you can find, check: Liszt Sonata (Prestissimo section, near the end of the sonata), 1932 recording. I wish I had a visual on this.
Cziffra live in paris (57) time: 1'26"Volodos studio time: 1'30" Cziffra plays the opening octave passage MUCH faster than Volodos, so fast I had real trouble keeping up while following the score.
yeah Cziffra play the octave passage at the beginning faster than volodos about fingering of yundi li i agree that he has not so big hand he has to trill in campanella with 4 5 and after that part running in 32th notes with all 1 4 5 4 so i think he couldnt reach octave with 3rd finger
Lang Lang slaughtered Horowitz's octaves in the HR2 transcription
Hamelin is still better.