If they dont wear beanies or celebrate jewish holidays, they are not jewish.Judaism is a religion. No one is born jewish.
First off, it's called a yarmulke (or kippah), not a beanie. I don't wear one in public, but I am still Jewish. Secondly, we have no idea which ones on this list go to services, celebrate holidays, and which ones don't. Yes many of them are probably considered Jewish because they were born into a Jewish family but they may not practice it. But then again, none of them ever publicly stated that they converted to another religion, so that's why they are on the list.The list btw was obtained from jinfo.org
Starting a post with "first off" makes one assume you are arguing. Don't want to argue but will state - If a person does not actively practice a religion that person is not really a part of the religion. No one is a part of a religion simply because they were born into a family that practices the religion as following the rituals of religion are what make the religion.
Therefore, the adjective 'jewish' is so ambigious it is practically meaningless, making this list and topic meaningless.
Well, sir, you're the one who started the argument by bringing up speculation.
I don't want to appear insensitive, but wouldn't being an orthodox Jew create real problems for your career? I mean if you can't play on Friday nights...
Not really, it seems the same as Christian...
Not really because it is the same as christianity? First of, what does this similarity have to do with my point?
Secondly, there is no real similarity. If someone talks about christianity we know they are talking about a religion.
Jew Pronunciation Key (j)
Well, I already knew this. And most people do. Why didn't you believe me? Or did you fail to understand? What choice did I have? I had three options, scream 'you are wrong' really loud, find an objective source and proof it or give up.
Keep the dictionary open then. Look up the word "set". Hopefully you'll see that, according your "logic" it's meaningless because it is aiui an English word that has more meanings than any other.There are, sadly, many ugly uses for the word "Jew" in history in literature - that clearly isn't what the posters here used to word for though, so words can have more than one meaning, yes?Can you not grasp the simple concept that "Jewish" can have more than one meaning and yet still have meaning? You can do that and still hold dear to the concept that the dictionary is authorative in some way if you like. Although I think once people start using words to communicate they don't necessarily have exact dictionary definitions in mind - that's not the way language works, but let's stick to easy concepts.
So, if words can have different meanings, how does one know which one applies?
Can I propose a truce? A person is a Jew if they say they are a Jew! If Horowitz or whoever claims to be a Jew and eats pork and performs on a Friday night, he obviously wasn't orthodox, but to claim he isn't a Jew is ridiculous. Ultimately, being a Christian is the same way. But, given the history of the Jewish people in Europe and America especially, I can't imagine anyone would claim Jewishness except if it comes from great conviction. Being a Jew has not usually been very convenient, so I'm prepared to take any "Jew" at his word.
Pablo Mercado: Why do you have this thing about the Jews? Bobby Fischer: I have no thing.. They have a thing about me. Pablo Mercado: *laugh* Bobby Fischer: Study the history. Pablo Mercado: Really? Bobby Fischer: Are you a Christian? Pablo Mercado: Yes, I am. Bobby Fischer: Well, you know. the Catholic Church. the Catholic Church taught for a long time about that they're guilty of the murder of Christ, right? Pablo Mercado: Yes. So? *laugh* Bobby Fischer: You know.
At best, then, the thread is inconsistent. How could they claim Bobby Fischer, and not mention Mendelssohn? His grandfather was a prominent Jewish intellectual, and Wagner's viciously anti-Semitic attack on Jewish influence in German music was largely aimed at the (ostensibly converted) Mendelssohn. Just a thought.
very true. this thread has been great in my opinion, very stimulating.
You ask, like you did - and afaict, the reply is there from the person who made the list, describing the origin of the list, and from others with definitions matching your own, and some perhaps slightly different ones too.From that, I conclude it's a list from a site of Jewish pianists and if I cared what they meant by Jewish, I'd know where to start looking The thing is, you decided that Jewish could have more than one definition when you asked, by listing some potential ones - but after the replies you decided that "the adjective 'jewish' is so ambigious it is practically meaningless" - which, as you can see, I didn't concur with but, afaict, neither did you 8 posts before when you listed some, nor a few posts later when you started c&p from dictionary.com I think this site explains it https://www.mindspring.com/~mfpatton/sketch.htm
I believe that according to Jews, Jewish status is, indeed, conferred by birth, through the mother.
See, this proves my point.
Unfortunately they is wrong. As anyone can become Jewish. If anyone can become jewish then being Jewish is choice rather than something born with.You cant be born with something you have to choose.
Horowitz once said........."Theres 3 types of pianist, Jewish pianists, homosexual pianists, and bad pianists"
Now i see why Alfred Brendel, Pollini and Kempff are bad pianists...
Three of the most successfull pianists you randomly consider as bad painists, if you only new what you are talking about we could have a discussion. I think the only reason you say that is because you think it may make you sound intelligent.
I was joking idiot.WOPS