Piano Forum

Topic: Pure Violence  (Read 2964 times)

Offline pita bread

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1136
Pure Violence
on: January 24, 2006, 03:19:44 AM
So yeah... I'm pretty sick of all the serenity in my audition repertoire (Bach WTCII PF9, Beethoven Op. 90, Ravel Jeux d'eau, etc). The peaceful calm is quite irritating...

I need to learn some horrendously violent pieces.

I've been pondering the Barber Sonata and the Prokofiev 7th, but my hands are small and the Prokofiev is too trendy. Stuff like the Villa Lobos Rudepoema is great, but just too long for a single movement work. How about the Fantasia Baetica? I don't know much about that work 'cept that I like it.

If only I had the technique, then I'd take the Prokofiev Piano Concerto #2.

I'm going to start a violence rating system, much like the Moizt/speed/accuracy ratings on daSDC. 0-10, or possibly 11 if the occasion calls for it.

So, any suggestions?

Offline JCarey

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 485
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #1 on: January 24, 2006, 03:27:21 AM
So yeah... I'm pretty sick of all the serenity in my audition repertoire (Bach WTCII PF9, Beethoven Op. 90, Ravel Jeux d'eau, etc). The peaceful calm is quite irritating...

I need to learn some horrendously violent pieces.

I've been pondering the Barber Sonata and the Prokofiev 7th, but my hands are small and the Prokofiev is too trendy. Stuff like the Villa Lobos Rudepoema is great, but just too long for a single movement work. How about the Fantasia Baetica? I don't know much about that work 'cept that I like it.

If only I had the technique, then I'd take the Prokofiev Piano Concerto #2.

I'm going to start a violence rating system, much like the Moizt/speed/accuracy ratings on daSDC. 0-10, or possibly 11 if the occasion calls for it.

So, any suggestions?

Peter, Peter, Peter... have you forgotten about the Crazy pregnant cat's Disco?

Well, assuming you can't get a group together for "that one part," perhaps you should try a piece by Ornstein like one of the sonatas? They are mostly very violent and impressive, and I assume that that is what you're looking for.

Offline pita bread

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1136
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #2 on: January 24, 2006, 03:33:34 AM
Peter, Peter, Peter... have you forgotten about the Crazy pregnant cat's Disco?

I haven't actually, but I probably shouldn't jackhammer my piano...

Offline brahmsian

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 262
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #3 on: January 24, 2006, 03:37:12 AM
Well, assuming you can't get a group together for "that one part," perhaps you should try a piece by Ornstein like one of the sonatas? They are mostly very violent and impressive, and I assume that that is what you're looking for.

That's exactly what I was going to suggest....

Ornstein- Sonatas, Danse Savauge, Suicide in an Airplane
Rzewski- Squall, Sideshow (from Squares)
Ligeti- Coloana Infinita
Chuck Norris didn't lose his virginity- he systematically tracked it down and destroyed it.

Offline JCarey

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 485
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #4 on: January 24, 2006, 03:40:50 AM
I haven't actually, but I probably shouldn't jackhammer my piano...

True, and, as I had previously stated, you would probably need to hire other people to help you play the piece, in order to correctly execute the "orgy" section.

It's a shame, I think CMD would go over well with those evaluating you.

Offline stevie

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2803
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #5 on: January 24, 2006, 04:20:09 AM
randomly let me see the score

Offline pita bread

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1136
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #6 on: January 24, 2006, 04:42:05 AM
randomly let me see the score

Haha you are mentioned in the score.

Offline ted

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4013
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #7 on: January 24, 2006, 06:20:08 AM
Something by Charles Ives ? "The Anti-Abolitionist Riots" perhaps ?
"Mistakes are the portals of discovery." - James Joyce

Offline ahinton

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12149
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #8 on: January 24, 2006, 06:23:25 AM
randomly let me see the score
Without specifically wishing to curtail the expressive manner of contributors, might it not now be high time for a moratorium on the use of the rather absurdly meaningless word "randomly"?

Best,

Alistair
Alistair Hinton
Curator / Director
The Sorabji Archive

Offline pita bread

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1136
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #9 on: January 24, 2006, 06:37:18 AM
I just thought of some more:

Bartok Sonata
Bartok Etudes Op. 18
Corigliano Etude Fantasie
Ginastera Sonatas #1, 2, 3
Stravinsky Firebird

Offline invictus

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #10 on: January 24, 2006, 09:26:11 AM
Bartok

Allegro Barbaro

Problem solved

Offline stevie

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2803
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #11 on: January 24, 2006, 12:20:41 PM
Without specifically wishing to curtail the expressive manner of contributors, might it not now be high time for a moratorium on the use of the rather absurdly meaningless word "randomly"?

Best,

Alistair

randomly, no 8)

Offline ahinton

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12149
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #12 on: January 24, 2006, 12:32:57 PM
randomly, no
Anyone else have any thoughts on this?

Best,

Alistair
Alistair Hinton
Curator / Director
The Sorabji Archive

Offline leahcim

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1372
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #13 on: January 24, 2006, 01:24:53 PM
Anyone else have any thoughts on this?

Yes. I'd expect some to follow your example when you are asked to remove the verbosity and do exactly the opposite.

However, some may keep at the same rate if you're lucky.

Offline ahinton

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12149
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #14 on: January 24, 2006, 02:02:43 PM
Yes. I'd expect some to follow your example when you are asked to remove the verbosity and do exactly the opposite.

However, some may keep at the same rate if you're lucky.
That would appear to be a "thought" about something else altogether.

I am unaware that anyone has specifically asked anyone else to "remove" anything here. In any case, you omit to clarify the number of words that must appear in a single post in order to qualify as "verbosity". I suggest that you have a look at the "Is there a God" thread on another part of this forum, which contains quite a few posts that are considerably longer than most, yet these have not come in for any "verbosity" comment from you or anyone else. This would appear to suggest that "verbosity", to you at least, is not merely a matter of numbers of written words but the identity of their writer. That said, however, I would also draw your attention again to the "Is there a God" thread where there are two posts from you containing, respectively, 398 and 447 words; whether or not these constitute "verbosity" is not for me to say...

Best,

Alistair
Alistair Hinton
Curator / Director
The Sorabji Archive

Offline leahcim

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1372
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #15 on: January 24, 2006, 02:58:24 PM
You omit to clarify the number of words that must appear in a single post in order to qualify as "verbosity".

Since you've asked me, I'd say it's probably more a question of signal to noise ratio.

That said, my post didn't say that I thought your posts are too verbose.

If mine are, I guess I'm not the one asking folk to change the way they post. YMMV.

Offline ahinton

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12149
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #16 on: January 24, 2006, 03:32:36 PM
Since you've asked me, I'd say it's probably more a question of signal to noise ratio.

That said, my post didn't say that I thought your posts are too verbose.

If mine are, I guess I'm not the one asking folk to change the way they post. YMMV.
No, I realise that your post did not specifically say this; no more am I saying that yours are.

So maybe we can now return, after that brief digresssion, to the question of whether the somewhat obscure and uncertain term "randomly" could be dispensed with...

Best,

Alistair
Alistair Hinton
Curator / Director
The Sorabji Archive

Offline leahcim

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1372
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #17 on: January 24, 2006, 04:01:52 PM
So maybe we can now return, after that brief digresssion, to the question

Good idea. So, pure violence, do you get much experience of that in your line of work?

Offline g_s_223

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 505
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #18 on: January 24, 2006, 04:14:57 PM
Find a fellow piano partner in crime, and learn 'The Rite of Spring' in Stravinsky's own piano duet arrangement.

You might end up throttling each other, but hey...

Offline ahinton

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12149
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #19 on: January 24, 2006, 06:19:12 PM
Good idea. So, pure violence, do you get much experience of that in your line of work?
I see that you choose to be selective in quoting from me. The question to which I clearly proposed a return was over the use or otherwise of "randomly", whereas you have preferred to ignore the context of what I wrote and return to the subject of the thread - which, again, is fair enough as far as it goes, although it might have saved people having to read two or three previous posts to observe this.

In direct answer to your question here, however, I should point out that the thread subject (which, incidentally, I did not initiate) is specifically intended to relate to piano repertoire so, in the context of this thread, my answer would presumably have to be in the negative, as I am not a pianist.

Best,

Alistair
Alistair Hinton
Curator / Director
The Sorabji Archive

Offline JCarey

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 485
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #20 on: January 24, 2006, 08:49:41 PM
randomly let me see the score

The piece includes the following instructions:

"In about 4 minutes, pound random clusters of notes in all registers of the keyboard. Aim
to break about 5 or 6 strings before finishing. At the very end, take a sledge hammer, and
smash the piano to pieces."

At the conclusion of the work, it is written that "you will have clearly demonstrated your FURY, and will officially be a true pregnant cat."

I'll share the music later... I think it might need some final revisions.

- John

Offline I Love Xenakis

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 422
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #21 on: January 24, 2006, 09:01:30 PM
>=)


How is it that you're even considering something besides the Corigliano Etude Fantasy?

not to mention:

Prokofiev Sonata No. 6
Ligeti Etude "Desordre"
Ligeti Etude "Automne a Varsovie"
Danielpour Mardigras
Xenakis Evryali 8)
Babadjanian Poem for Piano
Boulez Incises
Liszt Totentanz
Liszt Apres un Lecture du Dante
Antheil Sonate Sauvage
Rzewski Winnsboro Cotton Mill Blues
Rzewski Squares
Alkan Scherzo Focoso
Ravel Scarbo
Bartok Sonata Sz. 80
Ginastera Sonata No. 1
Ornstein Wind Man's Dance (Danse Sauvage)


And you said something about concerti?

Barber, Ginastera 1/2, Corigliano, Penderecki will blow them away.
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <)


Lau is my new PF hero ^^

Offline JCarey

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 485
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #22 on: January 24, 2006, 09:03:58 PM
I think the suggestion of Ginastera is a good one. The 1st sonata is not only a great "violent" piece, but it also appears to be the ideal length of what Peter wants.

Offline ryguillian

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 332
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #23 on: January 24, 2006, 10:49:09 PM
Quote from: ahinton
I am unaware that anyone has specifically asked anyone else to "remove" anything here. In any case, you omit to clarify the number of words that must appear in a single post in order to qualify as "verbosity". I suggest that you have a look at the "Is there a God" thread on another part of this forum, which contains quite a few posts that are considerably longer than most, yet these have not come in for any "verbosity" comment from you or anyone else. This would appear to suggest that "verbosity", to you at least, is not merely a matter of numbers of written words but the identity of their writer. That said, however, I would also draw your attention again to the "Is there a God" thread where there are two posts from you containing, respectively, 398 and 447 words; whether or not these constitute "verbosity" is not for me to say...

Alistair! I love you so much for promoting my thread!

—Ryan

P.S. You'll respond with something like: I was not in fact - indeed - promoting the thread to which you claim ownership; but rather, I was referencing it in an attempt to make a point of comparison in regards to another user's accusations about the verbosity of my messages ... blah blah blah blah ... but - in any case, in any topic? maybe? thread? whatever one might call it in this time - indeed, yes I am glad to "promote" your thread however small this audience might, in fact, in truth, be.
“Our civilization is decadent and our language—so the argument runs—must inevitably share in the general collapse.”
—, an essay by George Orwell

Offline ahinton

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12149
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #24 on: January 24, 2006, 11:28:44 PM
Alistair! I love you so much for promoting my thread!

—Ryan

P.S. You'll respond with something like: I was not in fact - indeed - promoting the thread to which you claim ownership; but rather, I was referencing it in an attempt to make a point of comparison in regards to another user's accusations about the verbosity of my messages ... blah blah blah blah ... but - in any case, in any topic? maybe? thread? whatever one might call it in this time - indeed, yes I am glad to "promote" your thread however small this audience might, in fact, in truth, be.
I have not the sligthest idea what all this rubbish is supposed to mean, if anything at all - and I care less.

If it pleases you or anyone else to determine in advance what my, or anyone else's,  response to anything might be, then so be it.

As to the notion of "promoting" your thread or anyone else, this, too is entirely foreign to my intent, since I labour under the unfortunate delusion that threads on this and other fora are to be responded to with as much intelligence as any given respondent can muster, rather than to be "promoted" as you write here.

I make no suggstions as to who may or may not "claim" "ownership" of this thread; my view is a far simpoler one - which is that you started it and, I hope, sought intelligent responses to what you started, rather than that you sought to establish and "promote" "ownership" thereof for whatever reason or none.

A persual of the posts to which one may assume you to refer will surely clarify that no one has specifically accused anyone else of "verbosity", despite the fact that "verbosity" has been mentioned; it dos seem that no hard and fast conclusion has been drawn from any such references to "verbosity", but then since "verbosity" was not the subject of the thread concerned, this is presumably no great problem or surprise.

Your affection - at least in terms of your perception of my having "promoted", rather than merely attempted to respond to, "your" thread - would appear to be misplaced and I reiterate that I regard this thread less as "yours" in any proprietorial sense than as something which you have chosen to instigate for what I would hope to be sound and valid reasons.

I am sorry to disappopint you to the extent to which my response here is not, verbatim, what you stated in advance that it would be...

Best,

Alistair
Alistair Hinton
Curator / Director
The Sorabji Archive

Offline stevie

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2803
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #25 on: January 24, 2006, 11:32:31 PM
HAHAHAHA respect da verboze fury of da aliztah

Offline ryguillian

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 332
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #26 on: January 24, 2006, 11:38:07 PM
Quote from: ahinton
I am sorry to disappopint you to the extent to which my response here is not, verbatim, what you stated in advance that it would be...

I'm used it: you constantly “disappopint.”

—Ryan
“Our civilization is decadent and our language—so the argument runs—must inevitably share in the general collapse.”
—, an essay by George Orwell

Offline I Love Xenakis

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 422
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #27 on: January 24, 2006, 11:45:33 PM
I'm used it: you constantly “disappopint.”

—Ryan

You wouldn't happen to mean "I'm used to it", would you Ryan sweetheart?

Very disappointing.
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <)


Lau is my new PF hero ^^

Offline ahinton

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 12149
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #28 on: January 24, 2006, 11:48:32 PM
I'm used it: you constantly “disappopint.”

—Ryan
Please forgive me, for I admit to being somewhat linguistically challenged when confronted with phrases such as "I'm used it" and words like "disappopint". As to the latter, I believe that a "disappopint" is about four-sevenths of a "disappolitre", but I could of course be wrong. As to the former, my scant intelligence deduces that you meant to write "I'm used to it" and, I am bound to conclude, if you express yourself in the way that you often seem to do, the fact that you have become accustomed to disappointment of one sort and another does not greatly surprise me.

In recognition of the thread subject here, may I nevertheless confirm to you that I wish you no violence, pure or otherwise...

Best,

Alistair
Alistair Hinton
Curator / Director
The Sorabji Archive

Offline stevie

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2803
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #29 on: January 25, 2006, 12:16:59 AM
wooooooooooooo alistair owns a thesaurus!

Offline I Love Xenakis

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 422
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #30 on: January 25, 2006, 12:20:19 AM
wooooooooooooo alistair owns a thesaurus!

Sadly, stevie doesn't.
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <)


Lau is my new PF hero ^^

Offline sauergrandson

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #31 on: January 25, 2006, 12:29:01 AM
Forkotet  ;D
Carlos Chávez (a mexican guy): anything

Offline pita bread

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1136
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #32 on: January 25, 2006, 02:31:35 AM
>=)


How is it that you're even considering something besides the Corigliano Etude Fantasy?

not to mention:

Prokofiev Sonata No. 6
Ligeti Etude "Desordre"
Ligeti Etude "Automne a Varsovie"
Danielpour Mardigras
Xenakis Evryali 8)
Babadjanian Poem for Piano
Boulez Incises
Liszt Totentanz
Liszt Apres un Lecture du Dante
Antheil Sonate Sauvage
Rzewski Winnsboro Cotton Mill Blues
Rzewski Squares
Alkan Scherzo Focoso
Ravel Scarbo
Bartok Sonata Sz. 80
Ginastera Sonata No. 1
Ornstein Wind Man's Dance (Danse Sauvage)


And you said something about concerti?

Barber, Ginastera 1/2, Corigliano, Penderecki will blow them away.

I mentioned the Corigliano  ;) Great piece, but then didn't someone break something playing that?  ;D

The Barber and Corigliano Concerti are also amazing.

Offline kevinatcausa

  • PS Silver Member
  • Jr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 36
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #33 on: January 25, 2006, 03:57:17 AM
Another Bartok possibility would be his "Out of Doors" suite.

Offline sauergrandson

  • PS Silver Member
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #34 on: January 25, 2006, 05:04:18 AM
Hymne de l'enfant a son reveil  :-*

Offline pita bread

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1136
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #35 on: January 25, 2006, 05:26:31 AM
Oh yes, how could I forget the Messiaen Vingt Regards?

Personally, I don't care for much Bartok besides the Concerti, Piano Sonata and Etudes. His music is too folksy in a corny way.

Offline I Love Xenakis

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 422
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #36 on: January 26, 2006, 04:52:52 PM
I mentioned the Corigliano  ;) Great piece, but then didn't someone break something playing that?  ;D

The Barber and Corigliano Concerti are also amazing.

grrrrr >=P
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <)


Lau is my new PF hero ^^

Offline g_s_223

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 505
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #37 on: January 26, 2006, 09:59:55 PM
Galina Ustvolskaya's Piano Sonatas; a good article about her: https://www.therestisnoise.com/2005/02/ustvolskaya.html

Offline minor9th

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 686
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #38 on: January 26, 2006, 11:23:27 PM
Gubidulina's Ciacona...check out Demidenko's live performance...it's utterly shattering.

Offline pita bread

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1136
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #39 on: January 27, 2006, 12:54:24 AM
The Gubaidulina Chaconne begins with a punch but wears itself out.

Offline pita bread

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1136
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #40 on: February 20, 2006, 08:06:36 PM
Ok, so the hunt continues.

Offline mikey6

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1406
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #41 on: February 20, 2006, 11:22:56 PM
what about the Schnittke second sonata - heard Boris Berman play it.  Has about 10 minutes of clusters and was the most irritating/powerful performance I've seen.
(does this thread still want an answer to the question or is the debate still on?)
Never look at the trombones. You'll only encourage them.
Richard Strauss

Offline pita bread

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1136
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #42 on: February 20, 2006, 11:26:54 PM
Let's keep listing pieces. No more debate.

Offline pianorama

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 362
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #43 on: February 20, 2006, 11:56:57 PM
Hmm... Clair de Lune? Moonlight Sonata? Fur Elise?

Oh, I'm sorry isn't this a thread about quite, tranquil songs? ;D

Offline emmdoubleew

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 314
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #44 on: February 22, 2006, 04:42:04 AM
I knew a girl who had no notion of classical other than some nice, quiet Mozart or Chopin. I played her the Beethoven Appasionata. In the beggining, nice quiet notes she filtered into a "background music" category right away. Then all of a sudden BOOM BOOM BOOM climbing chords she physically jumped off her chair.

As soon as i can play that piece I will, because it looks like so much fun to play.

And the person above jokingly mentioned Moonlight Sonata, but the third movement is pretty violent.

Offline jre58591

  • PS Silver Member
  • Sr. Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1770
Re: Pure Violence
Reply #45 on: February 23, 2006, 01:24:16 AM
hmm...maybe try balakirev's islamey if you want a romantic yet violent piece
Please Visit: https://www.pianochat.co.nr
My YouTube Videos: https://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=jre58591
For more information about this topic, click search below!

Piano Street Magazine:
Piano Street’s Top Picks of 2024

We wish you a Happy New Year with a list of recommended reading from Piano Street. These are the most read, discussed or shared articles of 2024. Read more
 

Logo light pianostreet.com - the website for classical pianists, piano teachers, students and piano music enthusiasts.

Subscribe for unlimited access

Sign up

Follow us

Piano Street Digicert