thanks be to God, from all the reviews i got, all has been very positive. a rather recent review said that my performance of haydn b minor sonata hob xvi/32 was that of "musical perfection" ( not that perfection was what i ever wanted to achieve! ); "a truly extraordinary rendition of waldstein" yet said another critic. and those were still within somehow normal, i.e what you often hear or read in reviews.
the too good a review i was talking about contains some unjustified comparison with one of musical giants, and showed abit of ignorance ( excuse me ) on the originator. now you got it?
donjuan, yeah it was mostly in my head, and funny that i didnt want it to spread away lurking inside other heads--that way the embarrasment would easily be multiplied. u know what im saying?
a great review never hurts, i would think. i wouldn't know because i've never gotten one. actually i think i'd make a great critique. i always have something bad to say with the good -except for my teacher whom i think is perfect
it's funny, but before i heard him play i thought there is never in the world a perfect performer. there's always something wrong with something they do visually, or technically. then, i saw perfection. (that's probably what your critique thinks of you). what can you say when you like it? nothing. you just sit for 10 minutes afterwards thinking - did i just hear what i thought i heard?
the only time i literally heard a pin drop was when i played liszt's 2nd or 4th ballade 20 years ago. someone dropped a pen. that was the only sound. to me that was like 'yeah, they're listening and they like it.' that was the greatest compliment i ever got. of course, i'd been practicing 6-7-8- hours per day/night. 3 hours at a time. now i have to pay others to listen to me. i'd have to hand out tickets saying - here, it's on the house. (i'm not terrible, but i have to catch up a little - from this leg. i can pedal now, though, which is good).
the first three granados spanish dances went over well 20 years ago, too. now i'd like to learn all 12. i learned the waldstein to get into wcu - and that was fun - as i had a few listeners outside the practice room door sometimes. brahms paganini variations i'd worked on, too, about 3 years ago, up to speed. then, i though, ok, the pinnacle of pianism is mussorsky's pics at an exhibition. i've been working that for a few years - but i think it's a few more off. even though i don't like 'bravdo' on it's own merits, i do think ending a program with something firey is a good idea. guess that i see piano as not trying to impress the audience as much as the composer. if you imagine the compsoer there and if you think they liked what they heard - it's a success. you kind of know in your own mind if it would go over or not.
yeah i guess you're right. it doesnt hurt, it just makes ME uncomfortable. heh, yeah, youre prolly make a great critique! and a wise one, too! do you agree that being a critique is never easy mainly because of the massive moral and professional responsibity attached to it?
re. your piano teacher. youve always mentioned about him with great admiration! that in itself is wonderful to see. i wanna see him perform. i really do.
re. you can hear a pin drop in your own recital. i totally agree with you, that is prolly the REAL greatest compliment one could possibly obtain. in this musical quietness, magic is often present.
re. your repertoire. wow, its super!!! go girl!!!
hehe, tds