The dictionary tells us that
intellegence is...
1a. The capacity to acquire and apply knowledge. b. The faculty of thought and reason. c. Superior powers of mind.
And that
intellect is...
1a. The ability to learn and reason; the capacity for knowledge and understanding. b. The ability to think abstractly or profoundly. 2. A person of great intellectual ability.
I think your parents may be confusing the two things, which are very different. Or maybe as rc says, they just want you to be a doctor or lawer!
Note that intelligence includes the verb
apply, which denotes action. Which is what a pianist does, they take their knowledge and directly apply it physically to music. This not the case with i
ntellect which requires the ability to reason, and learn, but not nessacarily do anything with that knowledge. Of course one could argue that reasoning is action, but of a different sort.
Being a good pianist requires intelligence, it does not require intellect. The two are often confused. Being an intellectual doesn't nessacarily make you intelligent, and you don't have to be an intellectual to be intelligent, although the intellectuals want you to believe that! Hence all the trappings of academia and the "intellegentsia".
Show your parents "Traditional Harmony" by Hindemith and some of Schoenberg's books on theory.
Then leave some music history books around for their perusal; any worries that they may have about your being underchallenged will probably evaporate. If they do not, rc's assesment is probably accurate.
And now to fix the toilet! Can I apply my intelligence succesfully, or am I merely an intellect?
