I quit classical piano two years ago. My teacher didn´t believe too much in me and maybe I had some lack of confidence.Anyway, comments and critique is welcome! Thank you for listening!p.s. The end of Claire De Lune is crap, I didn´t remember it at all, so just ignore it Debussy: Claire De Lune https://koti.mbnet.fi/niko87/claire_de_lune.mp3Chopin: Nocturne in C# minor https://koti.mbnet.fi/niko87/nocturne.mp3Edit: I just listened them through and noticed that the volume is very low! I´m sorry, I´m not so good to use those programs.. Just turn your speakers to south-east
His playing was always noble and beautiful; his tones sang, whether in full forte or softest piano. He took infinite pains to teach his pupils this legato, cantabile style of playing. His most severe criticism was "He—or she—does not know how to join two notes together." He also demanded the strictest adherence to rhythm. He hated all lingering and dragging, misplaced rubatos, as well as exaggerated ritardandos ... and it is precisely in this respect that people make such terrible errors in playing his works.
Ok, those 2 were probably the worst recordings of the quiet pieces i have ever heard in my life.I could not stand listening to it twice, its just too horrible.The rhythm is all over the place, the dynamics have not be followed, the tempo changes like every 2 bars, you make it sound like prokofiev+rachmaninoff on crack.The phrasing is messed up, sounds like a bunch of notes crumpled together, the last notes were messed up and unmusical, i see no musicality, the notes were rather correct, but like britney spears, the tone sucks
Umm i only listened to the nocturne,my connection is being slow so i didnt have time to listen to the other. but your rhythm is all over the place, its kinda hard to keep it right knowing that most Chopin pieces(ones i know of) are expressive.Try listening to a GOOD recording to see where you can improve.as for the tempo get a metronome.Thats all i can offer.