all parts
That the war in Iraq would increase terrorism was predicted by about every intelligene agency. It was also predicted by many middle east experts and terrorism experts.
Later they found out that the war in Iraq worsened terrorism even more than expected. THe war in Iraq has increased terrorism and helped organisations like Al Quada.
Second, you can't fight terrorism with an army. First off, you can never declare a war on it. That's just silly misuse of words. Like 'war on drugs', 'war on crime', 'war on christmas'. Americans are just silly and goofy like that. I bet they don't have a a pin-up of George Orwell over their beds.
But, terrorists are civillians that are hidden away. Then suddenly they will attack. How will you know if someone is a terrorist or not? Most of the time you will only know after thet blow themselves up.
Unless you infiltrate them or unless you wire-tap then. I don't understand at all how you cannot understand this. Do you know the definition of terrorism?
And what has Iraq to do with it? Wasn't Saddam so cruel that he kept all the possible terrorists in torture chambers?
No, most of the 9/11 terrorists came from Saudi Arabia. The people in Saudi Arabia are more cruelly oppressed than in Iran. Saudi Arabia is the oldest and most important US ally in the middle east.
The ones in the London attack came from Pakistan, another US ally, and illegal nuclear power. Futhermore, they supported the Taliban until the US bought them out. And presently they are protecting Osama Bin Laden. Great Job US!
Anyway, another essential think to do to stop terrorism is to stop participating in it. I know that the US only wants to stop terrorism against them and their economic allies. But even if you don't stop supporting and participating terrorism against others, terrorism against you won't lower as well.
An 'appeasement-loving European.'? How much heat have I been getting from bashing religion? Didn't religion cause 9/11. Didn't Bush claim that god told him to start the war in Iraq and Afganistan? Doesn't a major part of the Bush voters long for nuclear war? Because it means the end of the world and in their view the second comming?
'appeasement-loving'? The US and the UK supported Iraq all the way through their worst crimes. I don't understand what you are getting at.
I am anything but 'appeasement-loving'. If I was you wouldn't have called me 'appeasement-loving'. Let alone that you would have nominated me as one of the most annoying people on this forum.
You just don't get it. You don't understand how war and international politics work. Because you approach it the same way as you would approach rooting for your college football team.
Chamberlain, that implies that Iraq was a threat comparable to Nazi Germany.
If I lived in that time I would be fighting facsism in Spain against Franco long before WWII. Or at least I would be supporting that.
No, your comment is still based on the lies that were refuted even before they were told by Bush, Cheney and Rumsfelt and that caused about half a million deaths and the destruction of a nation. You still believe in those lies, apparantly.