(never been incarcerated).
all sorts of tecchie people live in those areas.
corroboration is the problem. if one person sees it - it's based on a sole account. if several do - you have to discern if they were drinking or doing drugs. people can see a lot of things. and, to have the discernable 'parts' from these flying machines for analysis.
that's so 70's. get over it. unless you have a pic close up - nobody is going to believe it.
i think he's a genuine kind of person and hard to argue with.
They are experts in knowing stuff about something which by definition you don't know what it is.
There's even UFO experts, nice oxymoron. They are experts in knowing stuff about something which by definition you don't know what it is.
Could be, seeing things in the sky in hardly a modern thing.In the Middle ages it was firey crosses, not saucers.Thal
The way Eric von Daniken presents things seems very convincing.
how much caution can you have.
which half of the heavens is rubbish?