Oh yes! You're right. I thought that was you. I will change it.
No, don't, because I didn't give the correct answer.
I was merely saying that the 7th we had in either 1 b3 b5 b7 or 1 3 b5 b7 [i.e the "7 flat 5" chord I gave as the (wrong) answer] is a dominant 7th and not a maj 7th. I was talking about the interval of the note.
Of course, the 7th in a 7th chord [aka dominant 7th chord] also has a dominant 7th, hence its name. But I didn't give that /chord/ as an answer. I'd just sharpened the 3rd [and the first time I tried to do that I did it incorrectly because I had sharpened the 7th too by mistake to a major 7th. For that matter I got it wrong the 2nd time as well when I replied to Michael. It was only when I looked again and finally did it in the edit:, but it was still wrong anyway]
So.....was the answer to number one too annoying or was it okay?
Not annoying. Arbitrary and capricious perhaps.
"It's like Question : Vikings came to Britain in...?"
and we're posting "err, 2000 bc" "err, long boats?" "err, search of food"
and you're saying "no" "no" "no", "ok, times up it was 'large numbers' "
I'd not say bingo to many of these. I can find earlier pianos with 4 pedals and even one with 5 pedals, and earlier pianos with 4 strings, as well as the 2 I gave. Why one 4 string and not the other?
I found 2 pianists that wear red socks - why that one and not the other?
For the other test, I generally knew which word to take from the sometimes 30 or so possible synonyms the dictionary / thesaurus offered.
Or, more often, when I saw someone else's answer I knew the word I'd taken was wrong and why. Not because the author of the test came along and said 'This is what I was thinking...'
For "bingo" you'd have to explain why one of those answers is specifically better than the others [even if that is the case purely in the context of the question or the test itself] and how someone [who doesn't know the answers beforehand] could have seen / determined that was what you were looking for.
Otherwise we're just throwing chord names until we get the one you picked.
e.g For a crossword puzzle, the right answer is usually known because the analogy fits in the number of spaces and with the letters already provided by other answers.
For the other analogy test there was usually some similar link that distinguished between a choice of several words, that, without the context, would have just been synonyms and could have been argued to be valid answers had the strong link not existed.
To me "talked about in the right class" just says that it's a valid answer. You've shown logic, but you haven't shown why your answer is right for this test rather than the other logical answers given. It just seems to be your arbitrary choice. We can't read your mind. With the other test we didn't need to.
That said, it's just a bit of fun, so it doesn't matter, but you did ask

TBH that you said in the other thread, submitting answers over and over to a multiple choice IQ test until you get every one correct or asking someone else what the answer is and why, showed that the IQ test is rubbish doesn't immediately suggest that you'll appreciate the difference between knowing what the right answer is and why and, the far easier task, of knowing what the right answer is and why

For fun test it doesn't matter [except I think seeing that difference is required as part of the role of 'deciding what the questions and right answers are going to be and why']
For something like science and maths there's a huge difference between the two. On one hand the smartest dudes might struggle for years to know the answer, but afterwards, it can quickly become trivial to show others [and perhaps even taught to school kids or googled by buffoons like myself]