There are several threads dealing with practice methods/tricks in the forum. Have a look in a few of them:
https://www.pianoforum.net/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=stud;action=display;num=1078506136https://www.pianoforum.net/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=stud;action=display;num=1074857245https://www.pianoforum.net/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=stud;action=display;num=1073455478https://www.pianoforum.net/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=stud;action=display;num=1073940433https://www.pianoforum.net/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=perf;action=display;num=1076338892;start=50https://www.pianoforum.net/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=perf;action=display;num=1076256873Your problem will be to sort out the true gems from the rubbish. I cannot do that for you because:
1. Who am I to say that my suggestions are true gems and the suggestions of people who disagree with me are rubbish?
2. What works in terms of efficient practice cannot be decided by verbal argument (I was going to say intellectual argument but…)
3. What works for a certain person may not work for you and vice versa.
So here is what you do:
Make a list of practice techniques that may seem to contradict each other. Choose two pieces of music of similar difficulty and similar technical demands. Practise one using method 1 and the other piece using method 2. After a couple of days/weeks practice it should be totally obvious which practice technique is the good one.
This is a very good way to go about it because:
1. It is scientific, and therefore bypasses mere opinions.
2. It increases your repertory (it forces you to learn two pieces instead of one).
3. It teaches you about the pieces (you will have to analyse them to figure out if they are the same degree of difficulty).
4. It teaches you about several practice techniques.
5. It makes your practice focused and mindful instead of mechanical and thoughtless.
6. It personalises your practice: soon you will know what works for
you and what does not work for
youbut if i don't try to play fast, how do i know whether i can play the pieces?
Do you mean that, i can increase speed when i can play the current tempo comfortably?
Look here for more discussion on the topic of slow practice, and then use the method above to decide what is rubbish and what is not:
https://www.pianoforum.net/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=stud;action=display;num=1081041954https://www.pianoforum.net/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=perf;action=display;num=1019674462https://www.pianoforum.net/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=perf;action=display;num=1080242821 I have read the website of Chang, the practice methods.
are they useful?
If you go through the forum, here are two opinions you will find:
Yes, they are very useful.
No, they are rubbish.
It does not matter what people say (and even if it did, who are you going to believe?). Chang has argued his own case. It is up to you to try out his ideas and decide for yourself.
Finally. Irrespective of how you practice, the way to improve faster is:
1. To equate practice with improvement. If you have not improved, you have not practised. If you spend five hours at the piano and after five hours you have not improved, then you have not practised, you have just done piano related activity.
2. To know exactly what you want to improve, that is you must practise with an aim. (If you don’t know what you want to improve, how will you know that you improved?).
3. To organise your long term goals (e.g. learn a Beethoven sonatas) into tiny short term goals that add up to your long term goal. Then apply [1] and [2] to each short term goal.
4. To be totally systematic, so that you accomplish [3]. Most people are totally chaotic in their practice. Think of building a house or baking a cake. You must do it in steps (small steps), The steps must be done in a certain order, and you must do them systematically until you get a completed house or a nice cake out of the oven.
I hope this helps.
Best wishes,
Bernhard.