There is a phone with a direct link to the Samaritans on top of Beach Head in England, to try and reduce the suicides.I say if they want to jump, let them.
Unlikely, since they would be on the other end of the phone awaiting calls from prospective jumpers.
If i jumped off a bridge, there would be another tsunami.Thal
If i jumped off a bridge, there would be another tsunami.
I would only jump off an I.K.B bridge.Not any old rubbish for me.Thal
OK then, i will find a T.T bridge instead.
AH, did you ever meet Gordon Jacob?
I live on the East Coast, have visited California, but have never seen the Golden Gate Bridge. As I look at the picture posted here though, there is plenty of room over by the railings. The way the suicide problem has been solved on high bridges on the East Coast is to simply erect tall fencing beside the railings with inwardly curving tops with barbed wire inside the curved top. In fact, you can see that same tactic applied at the observation deck on top of the Empire State Building in NYC. It's also sometimes employed on highway overpasses where there have been incidents of kids dropping cinder blocks onto the cars passing below. So why hasn't or why can't this proved solution work on the Golden Gate Bridge Seems to me it would be far more effective than posting signs, providing call-help phones that will mostly go unused, and maintaining suicide statistics and videos of the jumpers!
It has been rather shocking to read about all of the Bridgend suicides, but fascinating at the same time.Someone on the telly the other day claimed that the suicide rate there was actually under the National Average, but i find that hard to believe.What makes people do this at such a young age and with all of their life ahead of them?Thal
It was no better or worse than your "usual".Thal
Hey! You all are a bunch of thread jackers! We must get back on topic. Please return to discussing people who jump off the Golden Gate Bridge.
I just learned the most bizarre thing today.There was a movie about it called "The Bridge" where the directors actually filmed the bridge continuously for a year (they just set up the cameras and let them run I think) and caught 24 suicides on camera, then interviewed the families of the jumpers.
Here's the BBC article relatedAnd here is the whole documnetary.
Here's the new cable-stayed bridge completed in 2006 in Maine, the Penobscot Narrows Bridge which replaces the Waldo-Hancock Suspension Bridge over the Penobscot River. It features three observation floors at the top of the tower to the left in the picture, (I haven't been up there yet), about 450 feet above the river. If you look closely, you'll see the towers of another bridge in the background through the cable stays--it's the Waldo-Hancock Bridge completed in 1931 which is slated for demolition this year. Knock on wood, there have been no untoward incidents at this bridge yet. Here's the link with pictures.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penobscot_Narrows_Bridge
I think what would stop me from doing that is the thought that those we care about the most will suffer the most
Let them jump. We don't need society meddling with even more of our privacy. People should still be able to control wether they live or die; it's one of the few rights we still have.
I disagree, some people would still be alive and happy today had they received proper attention and care.
If you need to attempt suicide in order to get attention and care, then chances are you're screwed.