But what about setting the historical record straight?
I say hack away.
If it helps some people (aka the LIVING), why not allow them to do it? Same with seizing the skull or whatever. It's not Beethoven. It's not Schubert. It's not Chopin. If it means something to someone, maybe we should allow them that little sense of satisfaction.
essyne, we all luv u, u know. but did u really say dat?!
So, you won't mind me having your heart when you die then?Thal
I'm not sure how that would help anybody Sometimes, a symbolic gesture can be more important than scientific dissection. The man who left so much of his heart for the world in music wants to leave his physical heart in a church in the land he loved. Though we know that the heart beats blood and emotion comes from the brain, it's a meaningful symbol no? Even if it may be correct, give me the poetic fancy instead. I think anyone would be nuts to destroy such a beautiful illusion.And so we have Chopins poetic gesture. The heart that came from Poland, wrote so much music in her honour, belongs to Poland.
Does it matter at all what he died of?
there! listen to rc, people. he hath spokenth
That's well said, and, frankly, I agree with you, rc.But, then again, Chopin had a technical gift -- a natural endowment -- of musical genius that enabled him to express what his cleaning woman, for one, may have felt for her own children and neighbors. Being less talented than Chopin, she may have had no way to express it aside from simple loving and caring as best as she could. Still, they could have been equals.Chopin left a monumental legacy of beautiful music, but his record as a philanthropist is not so exemplary. Or maybe, it's just undocumented. Perhaps his cleaning woman was a greater person, spiritually.His heart is not his essence, despite the Romantic rhetoric. But it IS his heart and HIS wish that it rest in Poland. I think, as you do, that it should rest undisturbed. What killed Chopin is not important to me.
Shacking up with someone who smoked 50 cigars a day probably did not do his constitution any good.
My only thoughts on the subject must centre, with some inevitability, I fear, around incipient doubts as to how any research (however well-meaning and credible it may be) on the specific cause/s of and background to Chopin's death might help us to glean more about his music and the ways in which his compositional processes developed; that's not to throw a spanner in the works of dedicated and genuine scientific research for the sake of it but to question how any such results thereof can possibly inform us usefully about Chopin the composer in ways that have not previously been open to us.Best,Alistair
Well, "ada", whatever the subject and whatever one might make of it it's good to hear from you again after so long an absence (at least as far as I am aware) from this forum.
There is always more to be learnt. How can you not investigate as long as something remains to be investigated?
haha always nice to "interact" with you too, alistair. I have been busy with other stuff but have missed your hintonisms, whether the topic's sorabji or semillion ...