Thank you all for your input! I am on fire now, actually, more like a slight fever... It has been raining all day, we got very wet and stranded for a while. Don't fret; I am safe and sound.
Few of them will make good teachers. I had lessons, but to quite a large extent I'm a 'natural' and I wouldn't have a CLUE how to teach, certainly not a beginner.
Anyway, I can't honestly say I feel your pain, because that would be kinda pretentious, but I do feel very sympathetic towards your plight. My 2 cents is to pick up some completely new repertoire, something that's not technically demanding, e.g. Für Elise or MacDowell's 'To a Wild Rose' and make it as beautiful as you can.
I disagree. My first guitar teacher was mainly self-taught, he did talk to a lot of conservatory-trained students/ teachers only to find that we was at a higher level of playing, teaching and could explain things better. I would call him a natural, but he started late also- at 15 years old. Not anyone could do as he did, but being self-taught truly has its advantages. The only disadvantages to his method are:
lack of organization
focus on memory/ interpretation as opposed to sight-reading
therefore it takes too long to finish a single piece
FUR ELISE?? *dies*
Well I am sorry if you think I was trying to teach you anything
I don't think you will get a complete solution to your problem answered here though. In the end you have to pick yourself up and move on. I feel that demoralizing yourself by comparing yourself with other students will not help you much, so that is an important issue to deal with. Also finding the real reason behind why you are playing the piano, what joy are you drawing from it? Would you play the piano if no one in the world existed but yourself?
No, I probably wouldn't be able to exist without other people. But I know that's not what you meant.

I VERY RARELY play for myself, maybe just to let off steam, or as part of practice. So, probably not. I enjoy teaching what I pick up. I am fascinated by people's learning ability. It has little to do with piano itself. To cut the story short, I like playing piano, but I love teaching more. Does that make sense?
I talked with my teacher today, we really didn't get anywhere as I was afraid of calling her a poor teacher... And she gave these ambiguous answers and I didn't know what to think... I do sight reading on my own now, I started on my old books (grades 0-1), it's a lot easier now since all the pieces are familiar to me. It feels more like short-term memorizing though. I don't know if that's true sight reading.
momopi, I appreciate the no-nonsense post. Really. You didn't have to read if you didn't want to. I guess you just wanted to help. Thanks.
1-2) I got sick and slept a lot. I don't know if that counts as relaxing. I still thought a lot.
3) Er, if I love to play Rach 2, how the hell am I going to convince my teacher?? Seriously, though. None of my favorite pieces are within my level.
4) I only compare myself to compare progress to compare practice methods. (And I'll say it again, I prefer my own tone.

) Now if that is bad, tell me, how would I know I'm missing something if I don't make comparisons?
5) You're right. Make that 3 minuets and one sonatina movement (finally finished it

). Other than that, am not exaggerating. But I should stop feeling sorry for myself now.
6) There are only a few high-level pieces I really want to play. Otherwise, I'd love to teach.
7) See (6)
Yes, I understand it sounds rash that I decided to become a piano teacher. Though I started piano only a year ago, I wanted to be a teacher practically all my life. I realized traditional schooling doesn't really educate people. My only other option is to teach music.
Then you'd say, "Those who can't do teach." This is insulting really. I have deep respect for teachers because teaching is one of the most difficult underrated jobs. Teachers need more respect.
And it's not all about whether you have it or not. Do you think those people in conservatory are there simply because they're talented? I'm sure they're there because of hard work and that hard work probably took 5 or 10 years if not more.
Please respect the piano. It is difficult. I myself am having lots of trouble with it. But I'm not giving it up simply because my progress is slower than that of others
I am sorry. However there are bad teachers and good teachers. They are not all good. The good teachers I find are already well-respected, albeit the pay is still low.

If it's 5-10 years, it is not just a matter of hard work, but time. Being able to give that amount of time is a blessing in itself. Some people do not have that. And there are some that see no progress in say, 1 year and then quit. And then there are those who give the time, but do not make it to conservatory.
I am saying that talent is a bigger factor than even I expected. If our progress is slow, maybe there are better things to do for people like us...

It sounds as if you have mainly a problem with reading. I would recommend to work this out first. Memorize all the places of the notes on the staff up to the third ledger line and relate them to the keys. You have to see the related keys in your mind when you're reading. Then work on the coordination of the hands. Don't only work on little minuets, take sonatinas or easy sonatas. To get the hands coordinated takes quite an amount of time. I remember that it took me like two years when I started. Bach inventions are excellent material for this. And try to play some more "modern" stuff like Bartók's 10 little pieces.
SONATAS?? *dies*
Sorry for all the drama. I'll stick with this course as long as I can; I can't leave the piano for very long.