Sorry for being so brief. I just want to say: good job with this difficult prelude. Some minor issues but I really enjoyed it 
P.S. Sorry for this off-topic but I think that @furtwaengler is right: let's write more in these threads in which there is a clear background and a big effort to give an artistic value and let's try to help with advises to those who are asking for them. Let's stop all of us replying to those trolling threads (such as this one linked here[/url]) that are not worth and doesn't deserve even a second of our time. I was tempted to reply to that thread but I saw that doing it is a disrespect to the forum members who really work hard. No work invested in prepare the piece and no listening to the advices = not time worth to invest on commenting. On the contrary, good work (like is this thead) must deserve at least some reply.
Funny, I have been thinking the same thing. In fact, I even deleted the link you so generously and naively supplied.
It's a sad day, when people who never seem to comment in the Audition Room, only do so on the most deliberately junky recordings of standard repertoire. So much interesting has been published this month, including chamber music, unusual solo pieces, two piano pieces, and an entire recital of interesting music. All of these were serious, and well played, and most importantly, well-intentioned. And yet every day, the Audition Room resembles some junkyard of banality.
What gives, colleagues? Don't you appreciate good music that is played well? Don't you want to hear the piano at the best level it can be played? Why are you the most titillated by the deliberate worst? Why do you allow yourselves to become seduced by these pseudo-provocative Florence Foster Jenkins characters? Don't you value your art?
Walter Ramsey
PS Nice performance of teh Rachmaninoff.
Topic: (VIDEO) Rachmaninoff Prelude op.23 no.2 in B-flat major