I disagree. Chopin is, in my opinion, as demanding as Liszt. They are just different. Which arpeggios are more demanding, those on Chopin's OP 10 no 11 or those in Liszt's "Harmonies du Soir"? How about Chopin's Op 10 nº 2? Aren't Chopin's Scherzi nos 1 and 3 as physically demanding as any work by Liszt such as Mephisto? 
Hi there pianist 1976. Maybe what i wrote was not really understood. What i meant. was that in my book Chopin is better, and it means i have much more respect to his music, and i think it is harder thank Liszt's, but not necessarily in the technical area. Don't get me wrong man, i can play most of Chopin's difficult pieces and i can play Liszt's Mephisto waltz, and Hungarian rhapsody no. 2 and more. And in my humble opinion, in most of the oeuvre of Liszt is more technically demanding, but Chopin's music is not less demanding technically and much more demanding mentally, so in my book that is better. But i assume that it's also a matter of experience. Because i have an enormous fetish for Chopin's music, i play it for years, and maybe his music "seems" maybe a little bit easier than Liszt's, but again, only in the technical area. Did you try to play the Mephisto waltz?, it is extremely hard, especially the end, but i don't think it can compare with any of Chopin's music mentally..... anyhow i hope you understood me now, i appreciate you thoughts about this. have a great day.
