I feel that too many female composers over the years have been given too much credit for just being women, rather than being justly judged for their musical worth. I am thinking of the *many* female composers of the Romantic era who simply should just fade into history, such as Beach, Chaminade, and Clara Schumann, who didn't do anything revolutionary, but composed music that is probably as notable as that of John Field. The last 50 years have yielded female composers that are a bit more notable, but I feel generally the same way. I am thinking of composers like Joan Tower and Jennifer Higdon, who I believe will not stand the test of time, despite being very popular these days for composing very accessible and likable music with little lasting musical content. Here's to hoping that the true female masters like Gubaidulina, Saariaho, Chin, and others last the test of time.
I like Lera Auerbach--she's a fine pianist and composer.
Although I'm a girl, I tend to think this way about Hélène Grimaud; she's arguably a fine pianist, but not remotely worthy of the praise she gets, which she receives merely because of her "pretty face" (IMHO).
Saariaho is a composer whose viola trio I will be attempting very soon - and on the surface of it the work looks very well-written to me. Nonetheless, curiously, in what way do you regard her works to be masterful? I wonder, too, what you (or in fact anyone else here really) think of Rebecca Clarke? (of course, to my mind the viola sonata in particular...)
I understand [Auerbach's] probably the most celebrated and famous living woman composer today.
Absolutely not.
Indeed! What an absurd statement - and one which is in any case by definition impossible to verify. How could anyone possibly provide proof that anyone is "the most celebrated and famous living woman composer"? (and, even if it were possible, the candidate would most certainly not be that one!)...Best,Alistair
It's the impression I get, justified (if you like) by the fact her works seem to be the most regularly performed by some of the very best artists today (Kavakos, Kremer...), by the number of commissions from and performances in some of the most prestigious music festivals, and a truly extensive opus catalogue. Please tell me otherwise if these are not reasons how one such person is not a celebrated living composer (figuratively speaking)! I mean, I'm sorry but I don't know anyone else living and writing today who can boast such a career!
But of course, that is not to say she is a most accomplished composer. And in fact, this is why I wonder what people here think of her works, because I do not find her preludes for violin and piano at all remarkable, let alone revolutionary and ground-breaking! Just seems like another overrated artist whose oeuvre don't match the reputation presently garnered...
The fact that you do not know this does not of itself signify that there are no other contemporary women composers who could boast such a career if they felt like boasting in the first place, does it? Do you have sufficient reliable comparative statistics about her and, say, half a dozen other widely performed contemporary women composers to show beyond doubt that LA's performance/commissions/etc. profile is significantly higher than any of the others?
All the more reason why I would have thought you might have considered questioning your own assumption that she's the most celebrated female composer alive! I don't happen to find anything of hers that I've heard (not that I've heard a lot) to be of particular interest either.
I trust my perception enough to say that she is the most "celebrated" female composer alive today. Please, enlighten me and show me if there is any such composer whose works get the amount of exposure that LA's do! I said what I said because I would see her name significantly more than any others in so many programs of the world's biggest summer music festivals. And locally, in the program of artists who have and will come to perform in my school's recital hall (Aimard, Grimaud, Hahn, Kavakos), only LA's works feature in one of them - no other living composer is represented.Granted, it is hardly factual. However, I never claimed (or I don't think I did) that it is anything more than my impression. Besides, there are many truths that does not need to (and indeed, sometimes cannot) be rationalised to such extent. But that's just what I believe. It's hardly factual too In any case, I guess "celebrated" is not the most precise word to describe such a person. Figuratively, I'm not necessarily saying her works warrant whatever stature she enjoys today.Thanks for sharing what you think! Care to elaborate a bit more? The reason I asked is because I don't consider myself well-versed in contemporary music. While I don't think much of her works at all, I may very well be missing something, in which case I would like to learn what it is that I'm missing. In any case, I hope to be enlightened by people who are more familiar with such works, or just happens to have particular opinions about them.
Betsy Jolas
concerto hunt
I wonder what such a thing looks like.
Female composers? Never heard of him.
Sorry, I don't get the joke.
I can't help you there. You made the joke.
Actually, I simply organized a thought, comprised of six words and two punctuation marks, which, over the course of my experience in life very adequately reflects what I perceive as the general level of being in mankind, and, as I see it, you are, in fact, the one who apparently perceived within that enough intended comicalness to call it a joke.
Very funny, smart ass.
I'm done with you.
Anyone else care to actually comment on the topic?
Just don't expect hugs and daisies out of their music.