Moreover, women performers are quite shameless and unscrupulous in the way in which they so constantly trail the sexual redherring across the path of the public’s better judgment. The smirks, the mops and mows, the frank appeal to the basely sentimental side of the public’s nature, which can never resist the “charming girl” business, are simply so many devices to distract attention from musical shortcomings. [...] Most of our women pianists and violinists have physiques that can only be described as miserable, narrow-chested, shallow bodies, bad carriage, emaciated arms, undeveloped muscles, feeble tissues; they look like the poor, mean, thin, pinched, anæmic sounds they produce from their instruments—pale, wan changelings of tone. They can in the very nature of things do no better, but it is preposterous even for such people to expect to become great players, or even good second-raters. [...] The physical weakness communicates itself to the playing, inevitably and inexorably, with the result that we get the feeble, debile, thoroughly depressing and sickly playing that ninety-nine out of a hundred women give us. -- Kaikhosru Sorabji, “Against Women Instrumentalists”, in Around Music, 138-39, 139, 140.
[/quote]
I really do think that he ought to have know better than to have written like that; he did, however, name a few in his other writing whom he took to be exceptions to this, such as Guilhermina Suggia, Alannah Delias and Eileen Joyce - and, far more recently, he cited Martha Argerich as the kind of pianist that one would never credit was a woman from her playing unless you just happened to know who she was...
Best,
Alistair