Aside from the Beethoven, my main concern a lot of your program consists of rather frequently played selections. There are some people who sit on juries that just don't want to listen to the same-old played by 40 applicants year after year. Personally, I think each student should be evaluated on the strengths of their performance. However, some people, including experienced professors, can't clear their head of that overplayed piece when the next person walks in. They just stop hearing.
I'm not saying don't program frequently played music - I believe we should continually strive to hear the merits of each performance, no matter how hackneyed the pieces are. People sometimes forget how such pieces can still feel very fresh in the mind of one who recently took on the music. Unfortunately sometimes such minds are present in juries.
My advise is to throw in some lesser played material.
Is Bach required? Look into Scarlatti, Sweelinck, Soler, Couperin, Clérambault and Buxtehude.
Early Scriabin sounds very Chopinesque. He wrote some wonderful Etudes you might consider. Op 2/1, 8/12, and 42/5 are the frequently played ones. You may wish to look at some of the others.
Look at some modern Spanish composers such as Albeniz, Granados, Mompou, and Turina.
Give Czech composers a try. Smetana wrote several polkas. Some fun to break the seriousness of an audition.
If you want something less classicalish sounding, have a listen to Kapustin. There are some places where his music is not heard that much.