You "hear" that Steinway is a better brand to play?
Go out and play the pianos yourself. You don't have to just take others' words for it. There are some Steinways that played better for me than some Kawais, and there are some Kawais that played better for me than some Steinways.
Yes, Steinways are "meticulously crafted." But so are other brands/models selling at that price range. Yamaha and Kawai are better known through their lower-priced products (a price range where no new Steinway can be found) and that's where most people get their Yamaha/Kawai experience from and people think of them as "budget middle-class pianos." But once you get into the Steinway price range, the Yamaha's and Kawai's in that price range are also impessive and "meticulously crafted." Not much of a point comparing $40k~$60k Steinways to a $14k~$16k Kawais. Compare $40k~$60k Steinways to $40k~$60k Shigeru Kawais -- then see how they fare. That would be a more meaningful comparison. (By the way, compare using "street prices" that people actually pay, not the usually inflated "list prices" that are published by the manufacturers.)
All the above extends to just about every other brands mentioned in this thread.
Sample variability, voicing, regulation, "prep" issues, repertoire choice, you mood at the time, room acoustics, etc. -- many factors come into play and any one factor could be enough to tip the scale on whether THIS particular piano of this brand/model plays better than THAT particular piano of that brand/model. Just have to go out there, play lots different pianos, and come to your own conclusion -- and that conclusion can keep changing too as you play more and newer pianos.

(p.s. mh88, does the "mh" in mh88 stand for "Mason and Hamlin" ? )