...the majority of Liadov's canon has fallen into obscurity, not least because the composer dedicated his life to indolence and seems to have been utterly without ambition either for himself or for his music.
I think it is safe to assume that Beethoven on his deathbed would have been pretty happy with his achievements - Mozart, Schubert and Chopin also -despite the fact they died so young.I have been thinking though that there are a few composers who didn't really justify the talent they had. I don't mean in the sense that they didn't contribute something interesting and brilliant in their lifetimes, obviously, it's just that they could have done so much more.I think this is most true of Mussorsgy.
His Pictures could only have been written by a genius - and yet what else did he write of true greatness - Night on a Bear Mountain perhaps - Gopak - but what else?
I would add Satie to this list and also Blumenfeld. Maybe even Rachmaninoff!Can't think of too many more, but there must be a few!
I was thinking of the Scottish Composer Cecil Coles.If he had not been shot dead by a German sniper during World War One, I think he would be better known today, judging by the one recording I have heard.
Who he? Any relation to Musorgsky, by chance?I didn't know that he'd written anything about bears, on or off mountains; if you can't do better than this, then maybe go pack...You go add whomsoever you wish to your list - we'll try not to worry about this! - but however much anyone here might disagree with any of your choices, do at least try to spell them and their works in a recognisable manner - they deserve at least that, after all...Best,Alistair
Rachmaninov. I feel that alot of his works are at polar opposites. Up there are his Piano Concerti, Second Symphony, opus 23 preludes, Pag Rhapsody, Isle of the Dead. While his Opera, 3rd symphony, his songs opus 34 and most of his Etude Tableax are below par for sure. Certainly not a consistent composer but then again not many are!
He had a long period of depression and was practicing at the piano all day long from 1915 until his death.It´s safe to say that he didn´t work very hard on the works he did after 1915He was for sure a better pianist then composer anyway I think.
Given that he was one of the past century's finest pianists, that might at first seem a reasonable assumption were it not for the fact that the painfully few works that he wrote after leaving his native Russia show the very opposite of a waning of his compositional powers.
When I listen to Mussorgsky*, I actually get angry at him for drinking himself into early decline and death, and depriving us of his beautiful music. --s.* the spelling on the nearest recording of Boris Gudonov
McCartney post-Beatles
A fate not dissimilar to those that befell the French composer Albéric Magnard near the beginning of WWI and the Austrian Anton Webern near the close of WWII, each of whose premature loss of life denied us quite a lot more music.
The transliteration of Russian names is always a bit tricky, but I think I've seen the double-s (as in Mussorgsky) the most. The Russian original spells Мŭсoргский, so Musorgsky seems the most logical, though. Perhaps the -ss- makes the pronounciation more close to the Russian?It is indeed a pity he didn't finish more of his opera's, and a lot of what he did finish was then 'improved' by others (such as the Boris Godunov).