Well, there's this thread (the one in which we are currently talking). And then there's this thread
https://www.pianostreet.com/smf/index.php?topic=45958.0And there's this thread
https://www.pianoworld.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/topics/1880244/East%20West%20quantum%20leap%20piano%20o.html#Post1880244And there's this thread
https://www.pianoworld.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/topics/1878994/Best%20piano%20VST.html#Post1878994which, by the way, got a LOT of responses. And now I see you asking the same question in the thread where the new PianoTeq version is being discussed (it's completely out of place there).
Better than starting thread after thread and contaminating threads about other things would be:
1) Reading the history at PW. EWQL is discussed all the time there and has been for years. It's not new software.
To get you started with research on this topic, read this thread:
https://www.pianoworld.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/topics/1741622/1.html2) Bumping your thread and asking if there are any opinions other than the ones you have already gotten.
3) Just buying the stupid thing and finding out for yourself. I see in your other thread that you have already bought it. Now's a good time to stop asking about it and play it yourself. You know, to form your own opinion.
I can't believe you would say you haven't had your questions answered. Read those four threads...many people have told you not to get EWQL and why. Just because you may have mentioned EWQL after the first few posts rather than in the top post doesn't mean it's a completely different thread. I think people have stopped posting because there's nothing else to say and you don't seem to have cared about what has been said.
But anyway, it's all moot now, since you already bought it, which is why I wonder why you persist in asking about it. It's not the end of the world to spam forums with an incessant need for more opinions about the same question and then insist that no one answers your questions, but it's not good behavior either and it will irritate people (like me).