Just now I play well, one minute after I pay wrong and dont know why...And it is not a problem of memory, because I can write the sheet music from memory... Why? Why? why? I dont know...
But, how to deepen and develop a musical image vs. just how to memorize seems a bit mysterious.
When you spend hours on learning something. But you don't make any progress!
How would you relate musical image with one's musical conception of the piece?
Musical image is a philosophical cornerstone of Marik's, perhaps the, and it is something I very much have wanted to explore ever since he brought it up. It strikes me as illusory and even esoteric. I trust my musical instincts very purely, and I wonder if perhaps musical image, while something I don't have a full grasp of, is functioning subconsciously. Musical conception, a term in my vernacular, is even effuse, but I understand it broadly in the sense of interpretation, yet more cogent and connective for me as I endeavor to define it and discover it.
As a sculptor, one can look at an uncarved piece of stone and see an image presented rather than uncarved stone. Each stroke of carving uncovers eventually this image as manifested reality (what we would think of as reality anyway). I think a musical image is similar in that it is there in the "stone" and we carve towards that image. You could say that the work itself which one does is actually the interpretation, whereas a performance in which a musical image is clear has actually surpassed all the steps of interpreting and there is just a pure, all-inclusive musical image which appears as one idea (with all parts working together) to the listener. Musical image presented → Interpretation/Manual Labor & rebirth → Musical Image manifested. ↑ I think this point, specifically, is a very common place to stop.