Also, how does a God who is "pure love" do the things described in the Bible in Reply #17 above? (viz. instruct his followers to murder thousands of innocent babies)
In the Old Testament the passages you mentioned refer to Godless people who were in idolatry and unrepentant. God's removal of them was similar to a surgeon removing a cancerous tumor. These nations were going to infect His people with their sinful idolatrous teachings & attitudes, turning the Hebrews hearts away from God, their Deliverer.
So, the passages, taken out of the whole of old testament context & history sound like God is hurtful & unfair. Remember that "context is king" when studying the Bible and seeking the truth. Also, anyone who is not for God is against Him, therefore they are children of Satan and thus, God's enemies.
God is sovereign, just, righteous and loving.
I know this is an old post but it bothers me. I find this theology (certainly this is not mainstream Christian theology, by the way) scarey.
Skip the apologetics for a moment. Those Old Testament examples show anything but pure love. They are violent and destructive actions toward a largely innocent population. They do not seem in any obvious way to relate to instruction to "love your enemy" or "turn the other cheek."
There seem to be two ways to handle this basic contradiction of a loving God who demands action that would seem to be evil.
One is to say, as Janice did above, that it's okay to kill, torture, rape, pillage, etc., as long as you have accurately defined your victim as sinful. It's not only okay to do it, it's okay to enjoy it, because you are doing God's will. In fact, it's not just okay, IT IS AN OBLIGATION. The problems here are obvious. You can (and many do) justify anything, including bombing abortion clinics, murder, terrorism, war, etc. This viewpoint is obviously not limited to the Christian religion, as we can see from world events.
The other way would be to say that maybe that part of the Old Testament does not accurately reflect God's commands. Now we have another difficulty. If some of the Bible is in error, how can we discriminate between the parts that are right and the parts that are wrong? The proponents of the paragraph above also tend to feel pretty strongly that the entire Bible is inspired and inerrant (and usually is also a science text).
If this sounds harsh, it is because there is genuine reason to be scared. We've always had holy wars, but the available weapons limited the carnage to something merely horrible. Today the technology exists to do much more, perhaps destroy the human race.
I don't really know the answer. I can't side with the "evil is okay as long as directed at the truly sinful," so I guess I am left with the "Bible contains error" theory. I do think that hiding from this basic contradiction does not make the world a safer, kinder, or gentler place.