And I recall you participated in that offensive thread making fun of "ugly pianists" yourself. Yes, you took a "higher ground" but failed to clearly voice any objections to the thread's contents.
is there a safe list?
People who have managed not to tread on the toes of cmg at any point?
YOU? YOU? Complaining about the INSENSITIVITY of others??YOU were the poster who proudly contributed to the "ugliest pianist" thread who said, and I paraphrase:"OLD PEOPLE ARE EXEMPT FROM THIS CATEGORY BECAUSE BEING OLD IS UGLY BY DEFINITION."I found your comments so utterly offensive, (not to mention the very thread you contributed to), I asked the moderators to delete the damned thread. Which they did.So, please, don't b*tch about political correctness here or the suggestion that you have been victimized or misunderstood. You're obviously shameless.You owe us all an apology for your earlier tasteless posts.
Then I get called shameless and offensive and told to apologise, all for trying to help someone play a little better.What the hell is wrong with you?
I'm moreso just a bit surprised that you persist on not getting the metaphorical implication of the stroking comment. It's like really, you don't have to get into the details of stroking a cat just because of some analogy. The image that's conjured up in the average person is the important thing.
This really shouldn't have been the result of a Chopin thread.
Actually I said it was unfair to judge old people's looks through features acquired through the degeneration of one's body with age, but okay swhatever.Also I didn't say anything about being PC, I just made a metaphorical analogy to aid in someone's execution by basically saying have a more delicate and controlled attack rather than hammer the keys, and I get hit with diatribes about how society can't pet cats properly.Then I get called shameless and offensive and told to apologise, all for trying to help someone play a little better.What the hell is wrong with you?
I did ? ??
Because you're a liar: you didn't say that at all. You said, "old people are exempt from the ugliest pianist prize because old people are ugly BY DEFINiTION." I'm not wrong. Your post was SO offensive even the moderators deleted it.
Yeh, you DID. Your only comment was something to the effect that "if you feel old people are ugly, then what does that make me?"Does this ring a bell? Or all of you brain-dead?
Because you're a liar: you didn't say that at all. You said, "old people are exempt from the ugliest pianist prize because old people are ugly BY DEFINiTION." I'm not wrong. Your post was SO offensive even the moderators deleted it.Of course, j_menz, who is stuck in adolescence, and apparently feels I'm hyper-sensitive, would disagree and support your bigotry.
Also I think it would be unfair to bring up the old ones because well... yeah. I mean Mitsuko Uchida was beautiful as a young woman but obviously she is now a senior citizen, you can't really fight the ravages of age no matter the level of your inherent beauty.
Yeah that's basically what I mean, I mean her motion is a little more exaggerated than what I would say but I mean that's just how her hand moves and it works for her... but yeah that's sort of the basic idea.I mean I said before in that post (eons ago) about the directness of his attack being the main issue really, with the idea of the stroking motion diminishing the effect on the tone by the noise of the keys and action. Basically to make the note more sonorous and less percussive, as just the sound of your finger, nails, and the hammer slapping can have a huge effect on the tone, so softening the overall attack while still maintaining good volume gives a much more sonorous tone.That was what I was trying to get across to Brendan, but I mean, I feel that a lot of the time advice is given in more abstract musical terms, and tbh if the person is capable of actually following the ideas of tone colour etc, they're not going to be playing the way they are in the first place.So yeah, I used the cat stroking analogy, which is the one I was told and I always thought it was rather apt.Apparently I was wrong though.Also to dispel cmg's hyperbole once and for all, here's the direct quote from that thread.Make of it what you will, but it was definitely not quite what they would have you believe. Also obviously not deleted for being too offensive, since I found it just now. :rolleyes: