I have given this some thought, but I need some input from you lot.What is the most absurd piece of atonal rubbish that has ever been recorded?. I want to put a top ten together.Please assist with you tube links if possible.
You are not entering into the spirit of this
and you are supposed to post a youtube link.
You must know loads of plinkers
and I was counting on you to nominate something really daft.
Perhaps even the elusive P10.
Vladimir Plinkovsky - Grand Plinkathon dramatique pour piano.
Schumann - Piano Concerto
and for sheer inappropriateness of the title, Hommage à Georges Cziffra" by Régis Campo
Never heard of the composer of the work; Thal specified recorded works, so even if you don;t have a YouTube link to it, do you at least have details of such a recording? (label, catalogue number, artist/s, &c.)...
I can do better than that. The score is available in limited numbers from the Plinkovsky Archive, cost £2500.
I agree that the last piece I cited is probably not fully atonal; however it is undoubtedly a plinker.
What about this Bollox??This is the kind of aimless nonsense that I am after.
In light of the actual request, this perhaps?
I am greatly obliged to you for providing this information to me and will be even more appreciative if you could also confirm contact details for this organisation so that I might have a look and then consider pursuing any enquiries that might seem appropriate. I have to say that the price sounds incredibly hefty, though; unless it is a work of utterly monstrous proportions, it would seem to make even the most outrageously expensive items from the Stockhausen-Verlag seem quite reasonably priced! Do you have a copy yourself?
A most beautiful work from one of the finest composers of the early part of the last century, but one containing far too many tonal references to qualify as "atonal", so I don't think it would stand a chance of a place on the Thal list, really. But your posting of it and my reacquaintance with its opening embarrasses me, as I've only now realised for the first time how similar that opening piano figure is to the first notes of the subject in the Passacaglia which forms the fifth movement of my own six-movement piano work Sequentia Claviensis (premièred some yearsa ago by Jonathan Powell); I would like to tender the old chestnut about great minds thinking alike as an excuse, but I suspect that I would no more get away with that than I'd have any right to, frankly! I can only claim in my defence that this never occurred to me at the time of writing...Best,Alistair
I will notify the Plinkovsky Archive of your interest.
It is truly a magnum opus; I do not have the full score but suffice it to say I am informed that it makes Satie's Vexations look like the Minute Waltz.
Work is ongoing to provide a more concise edition
which still fully represents in comprehensible form the complex, both algorithmic and aleatory, nature of the work.
Well stuff my old boots.
Fair enough me supposes. And no offense to the work, or fans or it, or composers influenced by it (in fact, how does the saying go, the good composers borrow, the great ones steal? ha ha, just kidding Mr. Alistair! ).does this plink enough?
More like a Flinker I guess...
taking the 'three-handed effect' into modern times:-D
I am huge fan of Claude Debussy but this one I've never cared for very much, it doesn't go any where. (just my opinion)
Lack of direction does go towards a P rating, but the work MUST be atonal.Thal
Quote from: ronde_des_sylphes on January 22, 2014, 01:19:02 PM taking the 'three-handed effect' into modern times:-DOh my God, that is absolutely incredible and extremely funny. How moronic that he has actually got a score in front of him as if this random dishrag could be written down.That said, one must compliment him on the flexibility of his 4th toe.
Yes, this is the kind of rubbish I am after. Well done.Thal
How moronic that he has actually got a score in front of him as if this random dishrag could be written down.
The pieces are built on two basic ideas. Cage made a catalogue of what triads, quatrads (four-note aggregates) and quintads (five-note aggregates) could be played by a single hand without the other assisting it; overall some 550 four- and five-note chords were available for each hand. The second idea was to use star charts as source material.The process of composition ran as follows. First, Cage put a transparent strip of about three-quarter inch over the maps. The width of the strip limited the number of stars used. Within this width Cage was able to discern the twelve tones of the octave. Then through chance operations using the I Ching, he transferred these tones to the available octaves for the left and right hands. The resulting notes reflect only the horizontal positions of the stars, and not all stars are used, because the maps used a variety of colors, and Cage's chance operations limited the choices every time to specific colors. In the end Cage would have a string of notes and ask the I Ching which of them are to remain single tones and which are to become parts of aggregates. In the first etude this question is answered by a single number, in the second by two numbers, etc. So as the etudes progress, there are more and more aggregates: in the first, most sounds are single tones, in the final, thirty-second etude, roughly half of the sounds are aggregates. The aggregates themselves were selected from the list of available aggregates, described above.
Try this one! Pianists have been know to break their hands on this piece, but besides it's difficulty (which I respect greatly) this piece has the direction of mad man. That's Russians for you though.
WHAT??? I have never heard of a piece being so difficult or technically frustrating that people have BROKEN THEIR HANDS??? Is this true??? Can anyone verify this?
And this would make a good encore. It is misnamed. A few choice words come to mind, but love and Bach are not them.My ears are bleeding.
Is that high note in measure 11 (0:21) supposed to be from the Violin?? In general though, I think I'd rather listen to plinkers than Bach judging from this thread
Q1 - Yes.
You'll be pleased to know, then, that this guy has a lot of his compositions on YT. You'll be disappointed that his hour+ long piano sonata "Euvangelion" is not among them.
Q1 - Yes.You'll be pleased to know, then, that this guy has a lot of his compositions on YT. You'll be disappointed that his hour+ long piano sonata "Euvangelion" is not among them.
I think the only incredible thing about that video is that people *** CLAPPED??? How is that possible???That had to be the most awful, vomit-inducing, ear-bleeding, sanctimoniously performed, piece of sh!t I have EVER HEARD!!! Actually - someone was nice enough to give me the sheet music for it. You can have it if you want.
Brilliant. Laughed my tits off.This is excellent work chaps. We have the makings of a top ten of worthless crap.
There have been some excellent contributions to this thread, but you have yet to make one.I am dismayed
as I expect you probably know more plinkers than anyone else.