Piano Forum logo
September 25, 2018, 04:36:36 PM *
   Forum Home   Help Search  


Piano Street at the Music Education Expo 2013 in London

The first event of its kind ever in the UK, Music Education Expo took place at the Barbican Centre in London on 20-21 March 2013, hosting over 3000 visitors and 120 exhibitors.Piano Street was there to show the latest features, such as the Audiovisual Study Tool (AST) as well as other new features. Read more >>

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: metronome markings  (Read 1656 times)
michael_sayers
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1250


« on: June 04, 2015, 08:34:35 PM »

Hi Everyone,

I recall a source which says that for a m.m marking such as m.m. = 47 - 52, the tempo will range from 47 to 52 rather than being a particular tempo in that range.

To accommodate this the score could read "m.m. = 47, 48, 49, 50, 51 or 52". This seems like an unnecessarily long solution, especially for one that is m.m. = 99 - 130.

Maybe someone here has thoughts on how to have a m.m. marking encompass the guideline in that source and suggest a range of tempos rather than a tempo range.


Mvh,
Michael
Do you find this post useful? Yes / No
Logged

j_menz
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 10150


« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2015, 02:39:04 AM »

My suggestion - use a tempo/mood indication (such as Allegro, Andante etc) instead of a mm marking. They're much more useful anyway.
Do you find this post useful? Yes / No
Logged

"What the world needs is more geniuses with humility. There are so few of us left" -- Oscar Levant
michael_sayers
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1250


« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2015, 10:14:46 AM »

My suggestion - use a tempo/mood indication (such as Allegro, Andante etc) instead of a mm marking. They're much more useful anyway.

Hi j_menz,

Sometimes more precision is desired.  A mood indicator can go between the staves [such as "con furia", "solenne", et c.].


Mvh,
Michael
Do you find this post useful? Yes / No
Logged

j_menz
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 10150


« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2015, 12:22:23 PM »

Sometimes more precision is desired. 

Tempo is a function of heartbeat (so it's perception will depend on what's preceded). Some pianos sound faster than others. Some rooms sound faster than others.

Don't confuse precision with accuracy.

1 + 1 = 2.0000003143637 is still wrong.
Do you find this post useful? Yes / No
Logged

"What the world needs is more geniuses with humility. There are so few of us left" -- Oscar Levant
michael_sayers
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 1250


« Reply #4 on: June 06, 2015, 09:18:37 PM »

Tempo is a function of heartbeat (so it's perception will depend on what's preceded). Some pianos sound faster than others. Some rooms sound faster than others.

Don't confuse precision with accuracy.

1 + 1 = 2.0000003143637 is still wrong.

Hi j_menz,

I agree.  So one might suggest a range of (for instance) 47 - 58.  The source I read implied that "m.m. = 47 - 58" would indicate for the tempo to fluctuate within that range.  Yet to have "m.m. = 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 or 58", in order to avoid suggesting to some readers that the tempo will fluctuate with a range from 47 to 58, seems like a peculiarly long m.m. indication.


Mvh,
Michael
Do you find this post useful? Yes / No
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  


Need more info or help?


Search pianostreet.com - the web's largest resource of information about piano playing:



 
Jump to:  


Most popular classical piano composers:
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!

o