Firstly, it sounds pretty technically secure, so that's an excellent start.
A few thoughts which occurred to me:
It might be my speakers, or possibly because it sounds like you're on a digital, but I think you're probably not leggiero enough for the ideal. Peculiarly (I'm looking at the Cortot edition on IMSLP, as I have no idea where my own book is!) you are doing a dim. at the end of the first two lines where a cresc. is marked. In the couple of lines afterwards, your second, fourth and sixth rh quaver/eight-note of each bar have a tendency to be staccatissimo to the point of occasionally barely sounding. I would suggest that when this figuration returns towards the end of the piece you might want to present it in a manner which contrasts more with the opening iteration. The middle section is generally good and you have variety of dynamics but in general I would suggest that the piece would benefit from a more expansive approach and making more of dynamic contrasts (it's a little bit same-y throughout and I find your attack sound is crisp but slightly harsh - if it's on a digital that is understandable). It's nicely rhythmic and as I said at the start it sounds like you have the technical aspects well under control so I think you are well on the way to an excellent performance.