Hey all,
So I had an interesting discussion with my teacher today about performance in piano playing. It was a long one but I would love your opinion. She said two things that I in particular find note worthy. The first was the she has two level 10 students who are doing the same piece and will use this piece for their level 10 test. Well in her opinion the one who performs the piece well maybe will have the better chance of passing because with her performance she may better absorb the audience so much so that they will not be able to notice if one note is missing whereas the other girl, who in my teachers eye is the better player, may not pass because she is so boring and thus the examiner will more likely notice mistakes. I found this odd and in fact a negative thing not at all a good thing, but what do you think about this and what are your opinions generally. My teacher seemed to think this a good thing.
When I brought up the example of Horowitz she said that even he performed, something I cannot see personally. In fact, I recall his wife saying she listens to him from upstairs to avoid being influenced by anything other than his playing.
I of course believe performance and passion are good things, but the difference between passing and failing? That seems unfair.