I think that I do get some of Louis' sentiment - I had a problem with the sentence that I highlighted. One element is the "circus freak" idea - a person celebrated because of a disability, paraded and with the risk of exploitation - and what of when the media and public get tired of it and look for the next "odd sensation" and the next? Is it potentially harmful to the person who was thrust into the limelight? Things like that - Louis, does it go in that direction?
The other element in his post involves the person who works very hard for years and decades but remains in obscurity. There is an unfairness to it. As I understand the music industry, it can be unfair, period - who gets known and how stays unknown may not have to do with ability but other factors including chance, connections, or some other thing. The media and the public at large tend to be fickle.
I followed Derek's story some years ago and wonder how he is doing now. That documentary is a few years old by now. One element in his story involves caring parents who did everything in their means to help him forward. The discovery of his affinity to the piano was accidental, but what they did with it once they found out - the teacher they hired (and being able to hire a teacher, and coming upon the right one) - these are not accidental. Going back to the two elements of Louis' post, as I understand them, there are children who are very passionate about the piano and music, but they don't get to have an instrument, or a teacher, or a good teacher, or have doors unlocked for them in order to get known. These are other elements. He appears content in this kind of life, and if it is good for him, then I am also glad for him, like I would be for anyone's good fortune.