Hello, So I hurt my arm (ouch) and now my right arm is out of commission for the next couple weeks. I've been exploring various repertoire for the left hand alone but my teacher has expressed some doubts about my being able to play the Scriabin Prelude op 9 (this happened during my first injury as well, though at that time it made more sense for him to think it was too hard as my crowning achievement at that point had been Beethoven Sonata op 49 no 2). I'm very confused by this reluctance. Am I missing something about the Prelude? The nocturne is much more challenging, but I would still put it about on par with other pieces I'm working on and have completed with my teacher. To contextualize this, I've played several Scriabin Preludes for two hands, including op 11 no 14. I've played Chopin Etudes opus 10 no 1, opus 25 no 7 and I was planning to move forward with opus 27 no 10, which he recommended to me! I'm a bit mystified by his reluctance on the Scriabin prelude for the left hand, as by comparison, it's pretty mild. The voicing can be sort of tough, but it's very similar to the voicing required for opus 25 no 7 and not anywhere near as challenging technically. Am I just being an arrogant student? I've played through the piece and while it's still in early stages, I don't foresee it taking more than 2 weeks to play from memory, and I'm generally a slow learner! His counteroffer is the Bach-Brahms Chaccone, which I don't know that I would call easier than the prelude.