I still find that organizing according to task rather than time is more effective for me. "I will work on Item A and Item B / problem or goal A or B, in this session". You end up with your one hour, or 20 minutes etc. I focus better that way, and sort of feel the "point of saturation" when it's good to stop.
Thank you all.I've been working on a Mozart sonata, a Shubert impromtu, a Bach fugue, Czerny exercise, and mastering the scales. I've found that I have developed a clearer sense of what each should sound like, and as opposed to my prior method of just getting through each piece, I work on increasingly smaller and smaller sections attempting to achieve with my fingers that sound in my mind (I am probably expressing this in the worst possible way.) Previously, I could say that I had "mastered" 4 lines of Mozart in a week...now 4 lines of Mozart can take me two to four weeks.My teacher has told me that to achieve that sound image, I have to either increase my practice time or reduce the number of pieces on which I work. I think I'll just have to grapple with this. I could never understand how someone could practice to 5 to 9 hours a day...now I can see it. Perhaps what I need to do it to block out time during the day by "task estimate" (I also do a form of freelance so I'm accustomed to "billable hour by task" thinking") and block out my time that way.
Finally, and parenthetically (and I mean as a student of my technique Coach Thomas Mark), quit wasting valuable practice time "warming up" by playing useless scales, broken chords, arpeggios and exercises before you practice. The late Earl Wild wrote extensively in his Memoir that, by and large, this was a huge waste of time.
I want to second louispodesta's advice of two hours. I can personally attest that even two or three hours a day of effective, focused practice can bring wonderful results. That said, two hours of music a day is not enough for me. So I do spend more like three or four hours a day playing the piano--but at least one hour of that is just running through my old repertoire, or playing, as it is, for fun--reviving old pieces, sight-reading new ones, and enjoying music for the sake of enjoying it. This is why, I think, so many musicians burn out: they spend so much time perfecting their art that they forget why they became artists in the first place; because they love music--playing it, and listening to it!As a side note ... I don't fully agree with this. Often ten or fifteen minutes of scales, arpeggios, and Hanon exercises is very effective at loosening up my fingers, especially when I haven't played in a while, or on days when they're just plain stiff. But no more than that!
I want to second louispodesta's advice of two hours. I can personally attest that even two or three hours a day of effective, focused practice can bring wonderful results. That said, two hours of music a day is not enough for me. So I do spend more like three or four hours a day practicing--but at least one hour of that is just running through my old repertoire, or playing, as it is, for fun--reviving old pieces, sight-reading new ones, and enjoying music for the sake of enjoying it. This is why, I think, so many musicians burn out: they spend so much time perfecting their art that they forget why they became artists in the first place; because they love music--playing it, and listening to it!As a side note ... I don't fully agree with this. Often ten or fifteen minutes of scales, arpeggios, and Hanon exercises is very effective at loosening up my fingers, especially when I haven't played in a while, or on days when they're just plain stiff. But no more than that!