.

[ca88313]

.

[dogperson]

Before you conclude that you have revolutionized music forever, you might want to consider posting this on a piano technician website such as that of the PTG.

[clouseau]

Your ideas are very interesting. But I believe your highest quality is not inventiveness but modesty.

[klavieronin]

Hmm… don't other people have to start using your ideas before you can claim to have revolutionised music forever? There have, for example, been many proposals for alternative music notation systems that make music easier and more intuitive to read, yet no 'revolution' has happened because nobody actually uses those notation systems. Same thing with the 4-row Janko keyboard. It's arguably a much better keyboard layout than the traditional one, all scales have exactly the same fingering for example, but nobody actually uses it.

[fftransform]

I have discovered the most consonant and most dissonant 12-tone matrices:

https://www.pianostreet.com/smf/index.php?topic=64652.0

You plugged the circle of fifths and the chromatic scale into a calculator.

I have created 12-tone compositions that only contain symmetrical 12-tone chords. Additionally, I have extended Alexander Scriabin's Mystic Chord to create a symmetrical 12-tone Mystic Chord:

https://www.pianostreet.com/smf/index.php?topic=64631.0

This is the composition, yes?  https://onlinesequencer.net/697399

wow 4 chords

[ca88313]

.

[outin]

At least you possess something important for any revolutionist: Obsession 

[klavieronin]

I have completely changed the way atonal music can be composed and the way intruments can be tuned so I have revolutionised music forever.

I guess time will tell.

[dogperson]

 If you really want to test out this  theory, you  need to do a lot more than post this on a non-technician website and email it to the PTG.  A personal statement that you have revolutioned music forever is not credible . ... without testing and external scrutiny, you will continue to be a revolutionary only in your own mind. 

Are you ready  to have this rejected or accepted? I don’t need an answer to this, but it is a question you need to ask yourself. 

[ca88313]

.

[dogperson]

I completely agree with you. I have already scrutinised my own methods and systems but they definitely need to be tested, thoroughly scrutinised by professionals and either accepted or rejected. I am completely ready to have my ideas accepted or rejected, as long as they have been thoroughly tested and scrutinised.

Glad to hear it!!!!!!!  Best wishes; but whatever the outcome, you will learn a lot, not just about your theory, but about yourself.  

[ca88313]

.

[dogperson]

I sent you a PM

[ca88313]

.

[ca88313]

.