Hi everyone, I am curious about Schubert's late sonatas. I have only listened to them a few times each and I am struggling to understand them, in the way I have connected with many compositions Beethoven, Chopin, Schumann, Debussy, etc., and even some of Schubert's other compositions like the impromptus. Being a lesser-experienced pianist, I am not sure why these three sonatas (D 958-960) are considered to be so important in the repertoire. I'm hoping to start a discussion on these works. Also, what's the best recording?I'm finding that sometimes you can work to appreciate and like music that you initially felt indifferent to. That's what I'm hoping to do with these compositions, I just don't really know where to begin. I welcome all of your insight!
I love Schubert's late sonatas; I like Uchida's and Brendel's performances, but I like others, too. The C minor is fantastic - how can you not love the last movement Tarantella? The Bb is such a mixture of warmth, nostalgia, lurking darkness. I believe Schubert knew he was dying while he was writing he last sonatas and my teacher claims they are all, in one way or another, about approaching death, looking back on life, nostalgia, dread, unease. I think they are great, but if you aren't turned on by them, wait a few years and listen again.
if you aren't turned on by them, wait a few years and listen again.
Brendel never disappoints.
Like many great works, the late sonatas of Schubert are not instant gratification, but reward those who persist.I totally support the comment above. Radu Lupu plays these sonatas like I would love to. Thal
I love the last 2, but am quite unfamiliar with the C-minor. The one word which I think captures the overarching mood or ethos of the final Sonatas is “bittersweet”; they are like Schubert’s “farewell address”, a grand parting gesture as he takes leave of the world. Hannah Arendt quoted (in “The Human Condition”) Isak Dinesen saying “Anything can be borne if it can be put into a story”; this is in fact the overarching theme of ALL Schubert’s music. Personal misery and loneliness is presupposed, and death (including suicidal thoughts) was a seemingly relentless obsession. Yet, the music has uplift because sad music is fundamentally both cathartic and uplifting.Schubert to me seems at his best when the music crystallizes this paradox of joy and triumph in aesthetically represented sadness and gloom. Although the final B-flat sonata abounds in this, these aspects are more pronounced, in my view, in the A-Major. The B-flat I interpret as his answer to the Beethoven Hammerklavier (also of course in B-Flat), a key often used for the more formal and stately musical event, such as a valedictory address. It is the tonality of high musical oratory, and both B-flat sonatas are in this vein, like Brahms’ monumental 2nd concerto, Brahms’s op. 24 Variations. So while absolutely present, the personal outpouring aspect is merged with the high oratory style in D.960.For the real Schubert ethos on the aforementioned respects, I think you have them in most concentrated form in the D.959 scherzo and finale, while the slow movements tempestuous raging middle section captures Schubert’s raging tempestuous side. But throughout all these works, there is a defiant determination to “triumph over relentless adversity through music” similar to that impulse on Beethoven. The finale of 960 and A-major section of its slow movement make this very explicit. I love Kempf I’m these pieces, and Perahia as well. But there are dozens of great versions, because any pianist of requisite depth will engage with these and have something very personal and moving to say with/about them. Yudina is another name that comes to mind. Many are extremely partial to Richter, whom I “ambivalently” admire.