The premise seems very good. I like the idea of simple and basic, because it's very easy to give too many things, often for the sake of "making it interesting". And yet when everything is brand new, what may seem overly simple to the teacher since for him everything is 99% reflex, can have dozen things for the student to pay attention to. Everything ends up being executed half baked because none of it can get his/her full attention. That's why I like the idea of simple.
Something that has been bugging me the last time I popped in over here and again today - well my own teacher has been refining my hearing of timing, especially hearing timing played by others since that is my weak point. I did a few exercises last year where playing "with" the metronome as an exercise, I tended to be shade ahead or behind it and didn't hear it until I learned to hear a kind of b'ding b'ding rather than a strict ding ding of the two sounds merging. Well ...... when listening to a few of these samples, I seem to be hearing that "b'ding" - like the piano is coming in slightly ahead of the metronome. A couple of things on that. The first is simply whether I'm hearing right, since that is my weak point. The second is a technical one, namely:
My own lessons are on-line, so I record things. I'll have my headphones on - might have an external source for the metronome - and between hearing one thing direct-electronically, the other from outside, and then what the digital piano receives, there can be some kind of time lag. It's miniscule but when trying to be super accurate in timing the results can be misleading as to what you can do and hear time-wise (while refining this). Therefore: if I am actually hearing a kind of mini-syncopation, the piano coming in ahead of the instrument, could something like this be going on? Because of what I'm working on myself at present, I was listening extra carefully ---- and the lesson itself is about listening carefully to the example.