Home
Piano Music
Piano Music Library
Audiovisual Study Tool
Search pieces
All composers
Top composers »
Bach
Beethoven
Brahms
Chopin
Debussy
Grieg
Haydn
Mendelssohn
Mozart
Liszt
Prokofiev
Rachmaninoff
Ravel
Schubert
Schumann
Scriabin
All composers »
All pieces
Recommended Pieces
PS Editions
Instructive Editions
Recordings
Recent additions
Free piano sheet music
News & Articles
PS Magazine
News flash
New albums
Livestreams
Article index
Piano Forum
Resources
Music dictionary
E-books
Manuscripts
Links
Mobile
About
About PS
Help & FAQ
Contact
Forum rules
Pricing
Log in
Sign up
Piano Forum
Home
Help
Search
Piano Forum
»
Piano Board
»
Repertoire
»
ADD vs DDD
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Topic: ADD vs DDD
(Read 2494 times)
presto agitato
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 745
ADD vs DDD
on: April 11, 2005, 06:11:43 PM
What differences do you perceive between ADD (analog recording, digital mixing, and digital transfer) and DDD ( hte entire recording process was digital).
For example: I own Beethoven´s Piano Concerto with Kempff (ADD) and with Perahia (DDD) and the only difference i perceive is that Perahia´s sound is a little bit cleaner.
Whats your opinion
Logged
The masterpiece tell the performer what to do, and not the performer telling the piece what it should be like, or the cocomposer what he ought to have composed.
--Alfred Brendel--
pianomann1984
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 266
Re: ADD vs DDD
Reply #1 on: April 11, 2005, 06:39:20 PM
I think that digital misxing/transfer is so sophisticated these days that once the porduction companies are finished with a recording you really cant tell the difference, other than , as you say, the sound tends to be a tiny bit clearer.
Logged
"What would you do if you weren't afraid?"
xvimbi
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 2439
Re: ADD vs DDD
Reply #2 on: April 11, 2005, 07:00:25 PM
The differences that you were reporting are most likely due to different recording techniques in terms of who does the recording, what company is involved (companies have their "own" sound), etc. Mind you, the piano, hall, circumstances etc. are all different. The only way to find out would be to record the same performance simultaneously analog and digital. And then one would still need a stellar, high-fidelity stereo system to really detect any differences.
Logged
rlefebvr
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 469
Re: ADD vs DDD
Reply #3 on: April 12, 2005, 12:32:44 AM
The difference is that one comes from an analog recording and was then transfered and cleaned using a digital process.
Where DDD is a complete Digital recording from A to Z.
There is really no way to compare using to samples as they do not come from the same material.
The quality of the ADD material will depend totally on the studio doing the conversion.
Logged
Ron Lefebvre
Ron Lefebvre © Copyright. Any reproduction of all or part of this post is sheer stupidity.
BoliverAllmon
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 4155
Re: ADD vs DDD
Reply #4 on: April 12, 2005, 05:06:57 PM
do cd's typically cost more fore DDD?
Logged
pianomann1984
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 266
Re: ADD vs DDD
Reply #5 on: April 12, 2005, 07:34:30 PM
I dont think so
Logged
"What would you do if you weren't afraid?"
rlefebvr
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 469
Re: ADD vs DDD
Reply #6 on: April 13, 2005, 01:54:45 AM
They used to, but I doubt they would in today's market.
When I was a young lad, there was a cost difference.
DDD was a big deal back then.
If you look in the recycle bin you may even find a AAD version.
These are complete analog versions, never retouched and just slapped on a CD.
Those the sound is very bad.
It's always best to get a good quality DDD version, unless your looking for an old recording.
Logged
Ron Lefebvre
Ron Lefebvre © Copyright. Any reproduction of all or part of this post is sheer stupidity.
Waldszenen
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1001
Re: ADD vs DDD
Reply #7 on: April 13, 2005, 10:27:29 AM
What were the very first vinyl records then? AAA?
Logged
Fortune favours the musical.
rlefebvr
PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 469
Re: ADD vs DDD
Reply #8 on: April 13, 2005, 03:59:54 PM
Quote from: Waldszenen on April 13, 2005, 10:27:29 AM
What were the very first vinyl records then? AAA?
There was no markings for vinyl. The recording process was always the same, unless we talk about the old 78'. Vinyl rotates at 33, but the old ones had a 78 rotation. The sound was not as good.
Logged
Ron Lefebvre
Ron Lefebvre © Copyright. Any reproduction of all or part of this post is sheer stupidity.
Sign-up to post reply
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
For more information about this topic, click search below!
Search on Piano Street