OK, who reckons it's:a) The same lot again.b) Copy-cat bombings by some unrelated group.c) The government in a conspiracy to keep us afraid so it can introduce more 1984-style "security" measures.d) Typhoo and PG Tips in a conspiracy to keep us applying the traditional British remedy to any crisis i.e. drinking lots of tea.e) The French, in revenge for all the bad-taste Olympics jokes Londoners were cracking after the last time.f) The Australians, in revenge for the cricket.
WHY...., is it less bad this time in England; because FEWER actually died, or were maimed? Where is the cut-off point in destruction and death, and who gets to decide...Must we then, believe that the more that die the worse it is...When does ONE death count...
I didn't realize anyone died this time.
this is the reason why I agree with blair and bush that these extremist ideologies must be removed.
Except that I have confidence in neither of these leaders, sadly.koji
that may be, but it is better than doing nothing.
They're basically doing nothing, imo.koji
What has Blair done except wring his hands and profess to keep a stiff upper lip; sounds less like Winston and more like Nevile. Bush has bungled Iraq and failed to close the borders and demand that muslims in America provide information about terrorist cells in the US. koji
I know about bush more than blair. Bush did more than Clinton. Clinton fired missiles into Afghanistan, but he fired into old abandoned terrorrist cells. Are there flaws in the current administrations efforts? Definately, but something is being done.boliver
What...? Bush is NOT held to any basis, he IS his own, ALONG WITH his chief advisors...Make no MISTAKE..He is not hamstrung....He is suzerain...Now, whether or not he is wise in his plan and execution, might be a better question...John
f) The Australians, in revenge for the cricket.
If Bush actually closed the borders and/or did racial profiling (look at the outcry over the Patriot Act, for example), the ACLU and their breathern would be screaming bloody murder.koji