he also plays, according to one of my friends, one of the best goldbergs ever.
It is actually very hard to believe. I heard him live many times, including Tchaikowsky Competition all three rounds. No doubt, he is a wonderful pianist, with the most transcendental technique and a spirit of a true virtuoso. His touch is beautiful and recordings I heard do not do him justice.
However, unlike Richter, or some other music "thinkers" he does not strike me as the one with greatest musical mind, or greatest intellect. His interpretations are quite standard and very often I feel them superficial. His Beethoven I heard, although musically correct, is very unexciting, and in a sense immature. His Tchaikowsky no.1 and Rachmaninov no. 3 are surprisingly dull and highly uninteresting.
His Schumann and Chopin are not very inspired, lacking poetry and romantic feeling.
Most of all, he is a great PIANIST, and feels the most comfortable in highly pianistic and difficult repertoire. I don't think it is good or bad--that's who he is and that's what he does, and he does it wonderfully. He has a unique abandon in his playing, that's for sure.
It would be very interesting to hear his live FF, as the studio recording of complete TT on Teldec does not seem something extraordinary. I remeber him playing FF on Tchaikowsky Competition. The whole audience took the breath with the first note, and breathe out only with the last one.