That said, the principal problem with "Thal"'s teacher's remark seems to me that it implies that he/she perceived little or no value in the Godowsky works even as teaching material - an astonishing stance, given the plethora of valuable pianistic disciplines explored therein. There are plenty more pianists around (these days) who resort to some of them from time to time as part of their practice regimen, even if they do not also happen to perform them in public.
I happen to agree with you, I do like the Godowsky Etudes very much, they are at times stunning, at all times ingenious, and quite valuable in their own way, and I do play a couple (that's literally two). A pianist, if he or she is able, should certainly study some of them.
That said, I also agree with Thal's teacher - that Chopin said more with less. Musically, that is. He also said it first.
Personally, I do find a certain aristocratic beauty, a nobility in the directness of the Chopin Etudes that is not present in the Godowskies. Ironically, I find that the thickness of the texture in the Godowsky Etudes kind of compresses their emotional range. Sometimes the simplicity of the line gets crushed under the weight of so many notes, and it is rendered just a clever exercise in polyphony, instead of the succinct, eloquent stroke of genius that was originally Chopin's.
That's just my opinion.
I also suspect that part of Thal's teacher's point was that if one learns Godowsky before learning Chopin, it's like eating desert before you've eaten the meat and vegetables (and I happen to agree with Thal's teacher here as well.)
I'm getting hungry now
