Piano Forum

Print

Pages: [1] Go Down

Topic: Rach 2 (Read 4551 times)

christiaan

PS Silver Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 64

Rach 2

on: June 04, 2007, 09:07:07 AM

What is the correct version of the Rach 2`s openinig chords? To 'arpeggio' it like Ashkenazy or to play it 'blocked' like Richter/ Van Cliburn? Wat do you guys prefer?

I hate it when people arpeggio it to fit the size of their small hands! If you have small hands, don`t try Rachmaninov`s second concerto!

What do you think?

Logged

nicco

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1191

Re: Rach 2

Reply #1 on: June 04, 2007, 09:24:08 AM

A simple search will give you plenty of answers.

https://www.pianostreet.com/smf/index.php/topic,16731.0.html

https://www.pianostreet.com/smf/index.php/topic,9664.0.html

https://www.pianostreet.com/smf/index.php/topic,5566.0.html

Logged

"Without music, life would be a mistake." - Friedrich Nietzsche

jlh

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 2352

Re: Rach 2

Reply #2 on: June 04, 2007, 09:39:54 AM

Quote from: nicco on June 04, 2007, 09:24:08 AM

A simple search will give you plenty of answers.

https://www.pianostreet.com/smf/index.php/topic,16731.0.html

https://www.pianostreet.com/smf/index.php/topic,9664.0.html

https://www.pianostreet.com/smf/index.php/topic,5566.0.html

Indeed

Logged

. ROFL : ROFL:LOL:ROFL : ROFL '
___/\___
L   ______/    \
LOL "”””””””\    [ ] \
L      \_________)
   ___I___I___/

christiaan

PS Silver Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 64

Re: Rach 2

Reply #3 on: June 04, 2007, 09:54:11 AM

Indeed??

Logged

jlh

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 2352

Re: Rach 2

Reply #4 on: June 04, 2007, 10:03:30 AM

If anything, block the chords so that you play the low F and then the top notes together.

Arpeggiating it makes it sound like trash.

https://www.pianostreet.com/smf/index.php/topic,16731.msg179645.html#msg179645

Logged

. ROFL : ROFL:LOL:ROFL : ROFL '
___/\___
L   ______/    \
LOL "”””””””\    [ ] \
L      \_________)
   ___I___I___/

pianowolfi

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 5654

Re: Rach 2

Reply #5 on: June 04, 2007, 10:20:31 AM

Lol Rach himself arpeggiated them.

Logged

franzliszt2

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 979

Re: Rach 2

Reply #6 on: June 04, 2007, 12:56:32 PM

The thing with this opening is to keep a sense of pulse. So many people play it withput even thinking of the pulse. Whatever you do, keep the pulse. Arpeggiating is harder to do this, becasue you have to think...does the beat sound on the boottom note, or the top? It's interesting becasue you may think it sounds on the top,. but when you get somebody else to listen, they may disagree.

Logged

rob47

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 997

Re: Rach 2

Reply #7 on: June 04, 2007, 01:20:53 PM

maybe like this

Here is the link for the file you uploaded:
https://download.yousendit.com/EDD4142036FCF266

Logged

"Phenomenon 1 is me"
-Alexis Weissenberg

nicco

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1191

Re: Rach 2

Reply #8 on: June 04, 2007, 03:58:57 PM

Quote from: pianowolfi on June 04, 2007, 10:20:31 AM

Lol Rach himself arpeggiated them.

I think he preffered them blocked, playing the low f in the chord a little before the rest of the chord. At least he does that on a recording i have.

Logged

"Without music, life would be a mistake." - Friedrich Nietzsche

gruffalo

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1025

Re: Rach 2

Reply #9 on: June 04, 2007, 05:18:33 PM

Quote from: rob47 on June 04, 2007, 01:20:53 PM

maybe like this

Here is the link for the file you uploaded:
https://download.yousendit.com/EDD4142036FCF266

what.

Logged

lazlo

PS Silver Member
Full Member
Posts: 106

Re: Rach 2

Reply #10 on: June 04, 2007, 06:16:36 PM

I have two different recordings of rachmaninoff playing this concerto, and they definetely are not arpeggiated in these two recordings... maybe another, although i was under the impression I had his complete recordings.

Logged

pianowolfi

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 5654

Re: Rach 2

Reply #11 on: June 05, 2007, 09:35:52 AM

Quote from: nicco on June 04, 2007, 03:58:57 PM

I think he preffered them blocked, playing the low f in the chord a little before the rest of the chord. At least he does that on a recording i have.

Yes you are right, and lazlo too. I haven't listened to this for a while and my remembrance was not precise

Logged

jlh

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 2352

Re: Rach 2

Reply #12 on: June 05, 2007, 10:15:10 AM

The thing about it is this: that opening intro with the chords should sound like Russian bells. How does arpeggiating them make them sound like bells? Precluding the blocked upper notes by the lower F actually makes it sound more like real bells than just playing the entire chord at once. That's my thought on why Rachmaninoff played it this way on every recording I've heard of his -- even though physically he could play the whole chord with no problem.

Logged

. ROFL : ROFL:LOL:ROFL : ROFL '
___/\___
L   ______/    \
LOL "”””””””\    [ ] \
L      \_________)
   ___I___I___/

steve jones

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1380

Re: Rach 2

Reply #13 on: June 28, 2007, 02:38:53 PM

Quote from: christiaan on June 04, 2007, 09:07:07 AM

I hate it when people arpeggio it to fit the size of their small hands! If you have small hands, don`t try Rachmaninov`s second concerto!

What do you think?

Bit of a daft statement, given that the majority pianists are physically incapable of playing the stretches presented to them in the romantic literature. The most difficult tenth stretches are rolled by the vast majority of pianists. Atleast the ones I see play anyway! You do need a exceptionally large hand to play those chords solid.

However, I do get your point here. The chords during the intro of Rach 2 sound terrible when rolled imo. Simply detach the bottom F. This seems to be the accepted way around the problem, and has not spoiled some fine interps. Take Freire for instance.

SJ

Logged

mikey6

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1406

Re: Rach 2

Reply #14 on: June 29, 2007, 12:26:11 AM

Quote from: christiaan on June 04, 2007, 09:07:07 AM

What is the correct version of the Rach 2`s openinig chords? To 'arpeggio' it like Ashkenazy or to play it 'blocked' like Richter/ Van Cliburn? Wat do you guys prefer?

I hate it when people arpeggio it to fit the size of their small hands! If you have small hands, don`t try Rachmaninov`s second concerto!

What do you think?

The correct version? err.....
Personally I prefer it block, but seeing as I couldn't quite reach the notes, I used to bounce of the low 'f'.
I don't think having to break chords (which is perfectly acceptable) is goin to stop most people from attempting one of the most popular piano concertos in the repertoire.

Logged

Never look at the trombones. You'll only encourage them.
Richard Strauss

hodi

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 848

Re: Rach 2

Reply #15 on: June 29, 2007, 07:39:10 AM

ricther has an enormous hand reach of 12th (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
no wonder why he didn't roll those crhods

Logged

furtwaengler

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1357

Re: Rach 2

Reply #16 on: June 29, 2007, 08:20:00 AM

FWIW, Rachmaninov himself could hold down a chord of G, C, E-flat, G, and C with his right hand and is in the Guiness Book of World Records for such.

Logged

Don't let anyone know where you tie your goat.

nomis

PS Silver Member
Full Member
Posts: 176

Re: Rach 2

Reply #17 on: June 29, 2007, 04:53:12 PM

Quote from: hodi on June 29, 2007, 07:39:10 AM

ricther has an enormous hand reach of 12th (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
no wonder why he didn't roll those crhods

You only need a stretch of a F-A to play those chords evenly. It's not that difficult.

Logged

steve jones

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1380

Re: Rach 2

Reply #18 on: June 29, 2007, 08:57:06 PM

Quote from: nomis on June 29, 2007, 04:53:12 PM

You only need a stretch of a F-A to play those chords evenly. It's not that difficult.

First up, it has little to do with difficulty. I has to do with physical possibility! You can either reach a chord, or you cant. Simple as that. Possible / impossible. If it's possible but severely uncomfortable, then I guess you have to use your better judgement.

But also, lets not confuse the problem - the F to Ab stretch is not the really problem for most people, its the inner voices. Playing F - A is VERY different to playing F, C, Eb, Ab!

For me, I can play the F, C, Eb, A chord and I can play the F, C, Ab chord, but not the F, C, Eb, Ab, where the C has to be played by the 3 finger.

Logged

nomis

PS Silver Member
Full Member
Posts: 176

Re: Rach 2

Reply #19 on: June 30, 2007, 02:57:50 PM

Quote from: steve jones on June 29, 2007, 08:57:06 PM

First up, it has little to do with difficulty. I has to do with physical possibility! You can either reach a chord, or you cant. Simple as that. Possible / impossible. If it's possible but severely uncomfortable, then I guess you have to use your better judgement.

But also, lets not confuse the problem - the F to Ab stretch is not the really problem for most people, its the inner voices. Playing F - A is VERY different to playing F, C, Eb, Ab!

For me, I can play the F, C, Eb, A chord and I can play the F, C, Ab chord, but not the F, C, Eb, Ab, where the C has to be played by the 3 finger.

Whoops. Forgot about that. :p Yeah, that is a bit more difficult. It's easy enough to play the C-Eb on its own I feel, but the F-Ab contorts the hand a bit.

Logged

Sign-up to post reply

Print

Pages: [1] Go Up

For more information about this topic, click search below!

Piano Street Magazine:
Tamara Stefanovich: Combining and Exploring Pianistic Worlds

Pianist Tamara Stefanovich is a well-known name to concert audiences throughout the world and to discophiles maybe mostly known for her engagement in contemporary and 20th century repertoire. Piano Street is happy to get a chance to talk to the Berlin based Yugoslavia-born pianist. Read more

SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines