Piano Forum

Pages: [1] Go Down

Topic: The best interpretation of Tchaikovsky`s First Concerto and Rachmaninov`s Second (Read 9252 times)

christiaan

PS Silver Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 64

The best interpretation of Tchaikovsky`s First Concerto and Rachmaninov`s Second

on: June 07, 2007, 09:29:15 AM

Thcaikovsky: Richter, Argerich, Olga Kern, Pletnev...?

Rachmaninov: Richter, Kissin, Hough, Ashkenazy...?

Logged

iumonito

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1404

Re: The best interpretation of Tchaikovsky`s First Concerto and Rachmaninov`s Second

Reply #1 on: June 07, 2007, 06:35:33 PM

Bolet in both accounts. Gilels for T#1.

And please, no Rachmaninoff for #2?

Logged

Money does not make happiness, but it can buy you a piano.

nicco

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1191

Re: The best interpretation of Tchaikovsky`s First Concerto and Rachmaninov`s Second

Reply #2 on: June 08, 2007, 06:27:55 PM

For rach 2 there is no doubt.

Benno Moiseiwitsch.

Logged

"Without music, life would be a mistake." - Friedrich Nietzsche

franzliszt2

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 979

Re: The best interpretation of Tchaikovsky`s First Concerto and Rachmaninov`s Second

Reply #3 on: June 08, 2007, 06:31:45 PM

I agree with nicco

Also rach himself

Logged

nasalstein

PS Silver Member
Jr. Member
Posts: 51

Re: The best interpretation of Tchaikovsky`s First Concerto and Rachmaninov`s Second

Reply #4 on: June 10, 2007, 12:17:12 PM

T#1 horowitz with george szell (live)
only recording of this concerto which is fast enough for me to listen from the beginning to end.
3rd mov. seems to show he(horowitz) really knew what's "con fuoco" mean.

R#2 weissenberg with karajan
sounds sometimes a little bit slow and rather german, my all time favorite.
makes me think of the state of mind when rachmaninoff fought against nervous breakdown.

Logged

tompilk

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1247

Re: The best interpretation of Tchaikovsky`s First Concerto and Rachmaninov`s Se

Reply #5 on: June 10, 2007, 08:58:50 PM

Hamelin's T1 is my favourite.
For R2, I don't hae a favourite. no recording has jumped out at me, unlike Hough's R3, which is just pure magic.
Tom

Logged

Working on: Schubert - Piano Sonata D.664, Ravel - Sonatine, Ginastera - Danzas Argentinas

phil13

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1395

Re: The best interpretation of Tchaikovsky`s First Concerto and Rachmaninov`s Second

Reply #6 on: June 11, 2007, 11:33:14 PM

I can't get myself to listen to many different recordings of Tchaik 1.

For Rach 2, however, Rafael Orozco comes to mind. He also does a superb Rach 1.

Phil

Logged

elevateme_returns

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 754

Re: The best interpretation of Tchaikovsky`s First Concerto and Rachmaninov`s Second

Reply #7 on: June 11, 2007, 11:41:18 PM

Quote from: phil13 on June 11, 2007, 11:33:14 PM

I can't get myself to listen to many different recordings of Tchaik 1.

is that because you dont like it ? because i really dont

Logged

elevateme's joke of the week:
If John Terry was a Spartan, the movie 300 would have been called "1."

phil13

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1395

Re: The best interpretation of Tchaikovsky`s First Concerto and Rachmaninov`s Second

Reply #8 on: June 12, 2007, 01:34:44 PM

Quote from: elevateme_returns on June 11, 2007, 11:41:18 PM

is that because you dont like it ? because i really dont

IMO, there are better concerti for me to spend my time listening to over and over.

Phil

Logged

mcgillcomposer

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 839

Re: The best interpretation of Tchaikovsky`s First Concerto and Rachmaninov`s Second

Reply #9 on: June 15, 2007, 08:35:46 PM

Tchaik: Richter

Rach: Rach

Logged

Asked if he had ever conducted any Stockhausen,Sir Thomas Beecham replied, "No, but I once trod in some."

avetma

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 331

Re: The best interpretation of Tchaikovsky`s First Concerto and Rachmaninov`s Second

Reply #10 on: June 15, 2007, 08:54:46 PM

Tchaikovsky: Pogorelich
Rachmaninov: Hough.

Logged

elevateme_returns

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 754

Re: The best interpretation of Tchaikovsky`s First Concerto and Rachmaninov`s Second

Reply #11 on: June 15, 2007, 09:01:32 PM

really you like hough's faster approach?

Logged

elevateme's joke of the week:
If John Terry was a Spartan, the movie 300 would have been called "1."

avetma

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 331

Re: The best interpretation of Tchaikovsky`s First Concerto and Rachmaninov`s Second

Reply #12 on: June 16, 2007, 07:14:39 AM

Yes. Actually, I adore all Rach concertos with Hough. Especially 3rd.

Logged

soliloquy

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1464

Re: The best interpretation of Tchaikovsky`s First Concerto and Rachmaninov`s Se

Reply #13 on: June 16, 2007, 07:40:16 AM

Tchaikovsky: Rubinstein
Rachmaninov: Bolet

Logged

furtwaengler

PS Silver Member
Sr. Member
Posts: 1357

Re: The best interpretation of Tchaikovsky`s First Concerto and Rachmaninov`s Se

Reply #14 on: June 16, 2007, 07:50:55 AM

I'm not generally big on Ashkenazy, but his first recording of Rachmaninov's 2nd Concerto with Kondrashin is among the most beautiful recordings of anything...a ravishing tone, a great interpretation. It is far more representative of Ashkenazy's strengths then the recordings with Haitink and Previn. I love either Richter recording for a more menacing approach. I've a sentimental connection with the Rubinstein that benefits from the amazing Chicago Symphony/Reiner (been with me since youth).

The Tchaikovsky is not one of my favorite pieces. I like it most when it's abused, as is with the previously mentioned live Szell/Horowitz paring (if you can find it!). Szell brings the New York Philharmonic to a breaking point, a whirlwind of intensity...and Horowitz is involved!

Also I like a certain "boom chick" which rides high in a live Rubinstein performance with Dmitri Mitropoulos (if you don't know this fantastic conductor, Mitropoulos often conducted Prokofiev's 3rd Concerto from the piano! That's all you need to know

) If Richter, then Richter live. The studio account with Karajan came up dry (I think the two never enjoyed working together). There are excellent live accounts, though...with Ancerl, with Mravinsky, ect.

I am writing to much.

If picking one for each, with a gun to my head...

Rach: Ashkenazy/Kondrashin
Tchaik: err...Richter/Mravinsky

Logged

Don't let anyone know where you tie your goat.

Sign-up to post reply

Pages: [1] Go Up

For more information about this topic, click search below!