i'm dying laughing about these drinks, alistair.
Please don't die, Susan; just pour yourself one and enjoy it!
i'm sure you are a very proper english gentleman.
I'm not at all sure that I'm any one of those three things...
you don't have to try so hard.
At what? I didn't think that I was doing so, actually...
(are all the english like this?)
Like what?
oh. wait. you're scottish. that's right. ok. well, you've got a reason for it all.
For what, exactly?
i bet your ears turn red when you lie.
Only after a certain amount of time if I've been lying ON them (i.e. abrasion with pillowcase, if you see what I mean)...
alistair, why is it i think you are cute and thalbergmad is cute.
I cannot answer either question, I'm afraid.
what is the foreign attraction. when i hear the english and scotch speak - i can't understand a word of what they are saying. but, when typed - it is completely understandable.
How many British-based English-speaking people have you listened to and whereabouts did you do so? You've certainly never heard me speak (I have no accent from any particular area, incidentally). I find it almost impossible to imagine that you, as an (albeit American) English speaker yourself, are really incapable of understanding a word of what is spoken by anyone whose English speech does not come with an American accent of some kind in order to make it recognisable for you - but then I don't understand some of your written English, either (although I think that the reason for this is more to do with unfamiliar thought-processes than idiomatic use of the English language on your part).
doxy probably speaks the kings english, too, doesn't he. well, let's not bring him into this - lest we have to drag his mother in too. well, she might turn the whole forum around. whip it into shape, i mean. no monkey business there. and, there shouldn't be. but, you know - without mothers - children are basically orphans.
Now that's a relatively simple example of what I mean by your stream-of-semi-consciousness writing. We have the Queen's English in Britain nowadays (if indeed any such thing still exists at all) and have done for some 55 years, "doxy"'s mother has no obvious connection with this thread and, as a (presumed) non-member of the forum, is hardly likely to harbour any ambition to "turn (it) around", let alone "whip it into shape", reference to "monkeys" and their business severs the thread connection still farther and the statement that children are orphans without mothers is just plain daft - orphans are children without either of their parents, not just those who for whatever reason have only one, though, again, quite what that has to to with this thread is less than clear. See what I mean? And this is by no means the most glaring example...
which brings me to the point that i bet 2/3 of this forum ARE orphans.
How could you possibly know that? - even if your definiton of an orphan is incorrect in the first place (see above) - and why two-thirds? - isn't that a very high proportion? - indeed, a very great deal higher than the national average in almost all of the countries in which forum members live.
how do i know. i just have this intuitive feeling.
I would have expressed the fond hope that we all be protected rom a woman's intuition on the strength of this, were it not for the fact that your own intuition is surely grossly flawed here.
for instance, what mother in her right mind would allow opus10#2 to grow up the way he did?
The only comment I can make on that is that I presume only one such mother actually to have done so - but then what does this have to do with orphaned status? and, in turn, what does orphaned status have to do with this thread?...
Best,
Alistair