How about Herbie Hancock winning the grammy for jazz?
I know funk music is probably viewed as a "lower art form"
It probably is at any rate, but to Hancock's defense, at least he has a better air cut now. There's still hope.
I know funk music is probably viewed as a "lower art form" by many of the angry and sexually-confused white kids on this forum, but I think those albums are fabulous.
I disagree with you.
What else is new...I guess I'm wrong in being capable of liking "Chameleon", "Sly", "Wiggle Waggle" and other jazz-funk compositions of Hancock's just as much as I like a good chamber work or a piano sonata. It's all music, and it doesn't need to be stratified for my appreciative purposes. I didn't explain a reason that funk was better than classical music because I never asserted such a claim. And you seamlessly proved my point about angry *** kids spouting about it being a lower art form by...well saying that "IS a lower art form."There's plenty of reason to "defend funky" as you so eloquently word my actions. I don't know that many classical percussionists who can write a beat as bad-ass sounding as Harvey Mason's trap kit work with the Headhunters. And I would say that Bootsy Collins' bass lines with Parliament and James Brown were pretty damned important. Not to mention the horn arrangements, the recording techniques, advances in keyboard technology, production arrangement, etc.... etc.... etc....But what's the point. I could probably say something like "the background on this forum is black" and you'd probably still come back saying some crap like "I disagree! Yur arguuments ironic, how can you beleeve that "the background is black" as you put it. Every of the things you say is so EMPTYYY hee hoo ha ho!!!WHOOOOOOOO!!>M<O@@*(&@"
Hey man, I think that Speed Metal Rock Opera is the greatest form of music. How can you diss that?
Jazz is to classical what Mcdonald's is to great restaurants. It's trash and will allways be even if lots of people like it.
Well as thierry13 seems to know pretty much everything he thinks he needs to regarding music, perhaps instead we can help him with his English...Corrections please
To frigo : that was the most insignificant thing you ever wrote, and the most insignificant thing I ever saw on this forum. I mean come on, what was your point, if NOT insulting(as you ironicaly mentionned I would call it).
I am not english, and actually seldom speak it anywhere else than here, so give me a break about that. To frigo : that was the most insignificant thing you ever wrote, and the most insignificant thing I ever saw on this forum. I mean come on, what was your point, if NOT insulting(as you ironicaly mentionned I would call it).
I'm curious to know what people think of Cecil Taylor, a "jazz" pianist who's been putting out great records for years.
Even worst then Xenakis.
Reasons?
It's completely non-intuitive.
I'm just listening to the swedish jazz pianists Jan Johansson who blends jazz together with swedish folk music. Simply amazing.
Are you from sweden originally? If not Im happy that record is known to someone outside sweden. Well I´m happy anyways
I think the link you posted is a little laid back but it's definitely authentic Cecil, good stuff.
I´ve played on the same piano as Cecil Taylor . Appearently he knocked over some of the decor on stage while walking around doing a voice recital at Berwaldhallen Stockholm. I wish I´d been there.
Anyone else familiar with Desmond?
I'm fond of Paul Desmond. His sense of phasing is amazing - you can listen to one of his solos and their rich with dozens of good licks, there's never much filler (if any). His style of music is intoxicating, one of the chief pleasures of music. Anyone else familiar with Desmond?
I know he wrote the now-famous "Take Five" and played with Dave Brubeck, but beyond that I'm not as familiar with his work as I should be.
well, the fact is i don't know many things about jazz..i ve only heard Ray Charles, Gershwin and truly love them but these are not characteristic examples since they have only "elements" of jazz it their music, right? What I have in mind as "pure jazz" is really incoherent and vague which is not necessarily bad, but it strikes me as a music genre really insufficient to express every single human emotion - from Mozart's "joy of life" and Chopin's "melancholic optimism" to Beethoven's "passion for love" and Skrjabin's " inner buttle between life and death" .Instead, for me always, it seems that jazz is sth between "oh it's quite in here, i hear the rain and i got the blues" to " dance with me my fair lady" i mean nothing more internal and deep and passionate..But, as i said before , perhaps this is because i haven't heard a lot of jazz up to this day.I was wondering if someone of you who really love jazz can point me some jazz pieces that are really full of tension, like Skrjabin's D-sharp minor etude or sadness and devine beauty like Rachmaninnof's Elegie in E flat minor !This post may sound a bit bizarre coz all the terms I use are mine and I' m neither a musicologist nor a native speaker...I' m just trying to make u undertsand what emotions the music provokes to me and I' like to find "similar" way of feeling in jazz...
Jazz isn't usually about the individual pieces nearly as much as it is about the players, and per the development of "jazz" since the 1960s, I would say that any notions of "pure jazz" or a set definitions that define jazz vs. nonjazz are not quite relevant anymore. To me, it comes down to improvised vs. non-improvised and usually the best stuff in the jazz section of a record store can have any balance of each of these two things. Some jazz albums are heavily scored and composed and they sound excellent. Other albums are completely freely improvised, and often those sound good as well. I would recommend simply checking out several different musicians (join E-Music or something) and finding the ones that you can connect with stylistically.If you like classical piano playing, maybe check out the following improv/jazz pianists:Marc CoplandJohn TaylorEdward SimonRuss LossingBobo StensonCraig Taborn (who also plays a lot of Rhodes piano)Marilyn CrispellHåvard WilkJason MoranBob DegenStephen OlivaBill CarrothersEduard Ferletthere are lots that I would recommend, but these should provide plenty of interesting stuff to dig into.
Listen to this record. Its very soothing and mellow, like most ECM records. It´s a personal favourite
Indutrial, I´ve been wanting to check out Bill Frisell and John Abercrombie lately. Do you have any recommendations? I recently bought Angel song with Kenny Wheeler and I enjoy it alot.
And stay far far far far far away from John Zorn's Naked City records, which Frisell played guitar on. Those records are a bunch of pretentious dadaist horse manure. Probably the most over-contrived mess among all of Zorn's over-contrived projects.
What makes you say that? I find them to be pretty amusing.
@indutrial, peter thanx for your suggestions - as soon as i find time( and fix my monitors ) i ll listen to them and post my opinion!
Hi,I found this on you tube. Its Chick Corea and keith Jarrett playing Mozart concerto for two piano's.&feature=relatedPerhaps slightly off point but interesting anyway. There are some interesting comments from, I think Chick Corea at the end, which represent a pro jazz player's view of playing classical music. Those of you who enjoy debating these sort of thing's can also see two jazz legends tackle some classical music.
You can see Jarett had a better classical training than Corea. Some 6 yrs old chinese would do better than both tough.