Who has the most Forum Posts in this website?

[ghchopin]

I'm just interested, because lately, I have been posting a lot in forums, and I've been trying to get lots of forum posts on the websites, and I'm curious to know how much the most active forumer has.
On one website, I have 7859 posts.

[ahinton]

I'm just interested, because lately, I have been posting a lot in forums, and I've been trying to get lots of forum posts on the websites, and I'm curious to know how much the most active forumer has.
On one website, I have 7859 posts.

Posting stats here are, as in many other forum environments, shown against each member as part of the membership details. I think that you will find that member pianistimo, for all that she's not posted here for many months, still holds the posting record in this forum by quite a distance; you will find the number of her posts by looking her up in the list of members.

Best,

Alistair

[gyzzzmo]

Posts:
pianistimo  12171
thalbergmad  10849
ahinton  6912
 
Cant take these persons and thus stats too seriously though. Thalbergmad and Ahinton act like a bunch of girls in love if theyre together on a thread, and our dear (late) Pianistimo was in state of heavenly gibberish all the time.

So make sure you dont beat any of these 3 persons

Gyzzzmo

[ahinton]

Thalbergmad and Ahinton act like a bunch of girls in love if theyre together on a thread

What on earth or elsewhere is that supposed (not) to mean? Apart from any other considerations, if what you intend by reference to being "together on a thread" is merely that two people contributed to the same thread, then you could say the same of all the contributors thereto purely by reason of their also having posted to it; for example, there are already three people that have contributed to this one.

and our dear (late) Pianistimo was in state of heavenly gibberish all the time.

In the absence of any evidence of pianistimo's demise, your reference to "(late)" is at best misleading and at worst incorrect.

Best,

Alistair

[thalbergmad]

Thalbergmad and Ahinton act like a bunch of girls in love if theyre together on a thread

Act like a "couple" of girls, but not a "bunch", as that word would in most cases indicate a quantity of 3 or more and indeed we are not 3 but in fact 2.

Thal

[ahinton]

Act like a "couple" of girls, but not a "bunch", as that word would in most cases indicate a quantity of 3 or more and indeed we are not 3 but in fact 2.

But what precisely would acting "like a couple of girls" mean in the context of this forum? (a question that's really being posed to gyzzzmo rather than you, of course); the suggestion appears in any case to seek to imply the notion that all girls act alike, which is at the very least somewhat risible...

Best,

Alistair

[gyzzzmo]

I'm ofcourse speaking in terrible cliché's, but i suppose everybody knows what i mean you 2 acting like a 'pair' of gigling girls :p . If you have trouble understanding the context Alistair, i recommend you giving it a second thought, or even a third one if you feel bored

And my reference to the word 'late' might be misleading indeed, because A) she might not be that dead and B) can somebody who's THAT convinced she'll end up in heaven can really become 'late'? But also in fancy internet language we speak of dead threads and dead topics, wich doesnt imply that they gave our dear St Peter a visit, but that that its not very active anymore. And since our dear St Pianistimo isnt that active anymore......

Best,

Gyzzzmo

[ahinton]

I'm ofcourse speaking in terrible cliché's,

"Ofcourse" you are - and mistakenly instering an apostrophe the while.

but i suppose everybody knows

Supposition can sometimes be a risky business...

If you have trouble understanding the context Alistair, i recommend you giving it a second thought, or even a third one if you feel bored

It's your contention pe se rather than its purported "context" that I "have trouble understanding" (or at least I would do were I to think that such trouble is warranted); I note your recommendation, but I'm afraid that the ennui arising from your claim and subsequent attempts to justify and account for it is infinitely greater than the boredom that you refer to here...

And my reference to the word 'late' might be misleading indeed, because A) she might not be that dead and B) can somebody who's THAT convinced she'll end up in heaven can really become 'late'? But also in fancy internet language we speak of dead threads and dead topics, wich doesnt imply that they gave our dear St Peter a visit, but that that its not very active anymore. And since our dear St Pianistimo isnt that active anymore......

Now you're being far more sensible! - other than in writing in A) that "she might not be that dead" when one is either dead or one isn't and in acting the doubting Thomas over the possibility of "lateness" in B) when it is surely perfectly possible for people who believe in heaven to arrive there "late", just as they can arrive elsewhere "late" (you know, delayed flight, leaves on the rail line, &c.). I think that your misplaced apostrophe might have escaped from "its" in your penultimate sentence. I have no idea how active St Pianistimo may be otherwise, but it is indeed true that her posting activity here has been zilch for quite some time.

Best,

Alistair

[goldentone]

A truer measure, I think, would be in the volume of the poster, rather than number of posts.  But even at that, I believe the winner remains the same.

[ahinton]

A truer measure, I think, would be in the volume of the poster, rather than number of posts.  But even at that, I believe the winner remains the same.

And still with an outright win, at that (assuming that we're speaking in competitive terms here)...

Best,

Alistair

[ghchopin]

12,000+ Forum posts??
It would take me about 150 days, if I really wanted to, to get that much.
Impossible for me 

[thalbergmad]

Well the woman was in idiot and a spammer. It did not take her long to reach her total.

I am glad she is no longer here, although sometimes i do miss a good old pianostreet argument.

Thal

[ghchopin]

I have 8,200 Forum posts now on that website, I think I won't try to get the most here.

[thalbergmad]

It would be a pointless exercise. Total number of posts is just a statistic and has no value on its own.

There are people here with less than 10 posts that have more value contained than my 10,000.

Thal

[ahinton]

It would be a pointless exercise. Total number of posts is just a statistic and has no value on its own.

True.

There are people here with less than 10 posts that have more value contained than my 10,000.

Oh, come now! Your modesty here is way overdone!

Best,

Alistair

[shortyshort]

Wasn't she also "pianonut" who also had many posts?

[ahinton]

Wasn't she also "pianonut" who also had many posts?

I don't know - and could care less, frankly; all those Protestant Presbyterian evangelical litanies were more than enough for me (and plenty of other forum members) to be well and truly discouraged from having anything to do with her outpourings and they served to divert people's attention from anything that she might have had to say on any other matter. I sensed nevertheless that there is a perfectly decent and even well-meaning person underneath it all, but one who had nevertheless permitted herself to be so violently indoctrinated in certain very particular directions that the results of that indoctrination ended up superimposing themselves upon almost anything else that she might otherwise have thought and expressed - a very depressing phenomenon to have encountered and to try to deal with...

Best,

Alistair

[shortyshort]

You really are Sir Humphrey Appleby.

[ahinton]

You really are Sir Humphrey Appleby.

Not at all, for that particular Sir Humphrey died years ago whereas the above post was typed manually  earlier this evening by a living human being, however much that might seem unlikely to you; what you really appear to mean but prefer to refrain from admitting in your claim here is that you are not especially comfortable with sentences that comprise more than a dozen or so words.

Never mind!

Best,

Alistair

[ghchopin]

I'm just interested, because lately, I have been posting a lot in forums, and I've been trying to get lots of forum posts on the websites, and I'm curious to know how much the most active forumer has.
On one website, I have 7859 posts.

I've got 9,087 Posts now, I was trying to get 10,000 before 2010, but I've been working on programming Lua in that game

[john11inc]

I might.

[pianochick93]

I've got 9,087 Posts now, I was trying to get 10,000 before 2010, but I've been working on programming Lua in that game

*clap clap*

Would you like an internet cookie? Or is your reward our supposed adoration?

[ghchopin]

*clap clap*

Would you like an internet cookie? Or is your reward our supposed adoration?

Yeah

Old bump :O

[liordavid]

I'm going for the record 

[littletune]

The record is 12143 ! I've looked on forum statistics. sooo that's kinda a LOT!

[liordavid]

I think that was Bob

[Bob]

I just looked today.  It's pianistimo.  I was shocked.  Haha.

[littletune]

Well i was really surprised that Bob doesn't have that many posts!  I don't know why I thought he should have more posts 

[wert718]

I only have 102, and I've been here longer than both of you. 

[ghchopin]

I come to this forum every so often, but every time I see a post by Bob
Wow, back when I made this thread, I had 7859 posts..

[littletune]

Bob doesn't have the most posts but he is a top topic starter!! 802 topics started! 

[ghchopin]

Haha I remember this thread. I have 30,915 posts on that site
Top 50 poster.

[Bob]

I have many questions.  But not much food.

[pianoplayjl]

I miss thalbergmad. where is he?