I'm ofcourse speaking in terrible cliché's,
"Ofcourse" you are - and mistakenly instering an apostrophe the while.
but i suppose everybody knows
Supposition can sometimes be a risky business...
If you have trouble understanding the context Alistair, i recommend you giving it a second thought, or even a third one if you feel bored 
It's your contention
pe se rather than its purported "context" that I "have trouble understanding" (or at least I would do were I to think that such trouble is warranted); I note your recommendation, but I'm afraid that the
ennui arising from your claim and subsequent attempts to justify and account for it is infinitely greater than the boredom that you refer to here...
And my reference to the word 'late' might be misleading indeed, because A) she might not be that dead and B) can somebody who's THAT convinced she'll end up in heaven can really become 'late'? But also in fancy internet language we speak of dead threads and dead topics, wich doesnt imply that they gave our dear St Peter a visit, but that that its not very active anymore. And since our dear St Pianistimo isnt that active anymore......
Now you're being far more sensible! - other than in writing in A) that "she might not be that dead" when one is either dead or one isn't and in acting the doubting Thomas over the possibility of "lateness" in B) when it is surely perfectly possible for people who believe in heaven to arrive there "late", just as they can arrive elsewhere "late" (you know, delayed flight, leaves on the rail line, &c.). I think that your misplaced apostrophe might have escaped from "its" in your penultimate sentence. I have no idea how active St Pianistimo may be otherwise, but it is indeed true that her posting activity here has been zilch for quite some time.
Best,
Alistair