I have an unexplainable dislike for most pieces by this composer. Lately I have had a lot of trouble reading music that I don't like. Reading is really hard for me anyway and if the end product doesn't even sound nice, I get really frustrated. I am pretty overworked at the moment and a bit tired mostly, so I have trouble concentrating. I tried to force myself to work on several pieces that I didn't care for and got so stressed that I actually thought that maybe I should quit lessons. My mind often got totally blank when I was supposed to play...But can't let myself quit so I told my teacher that I need some time off those pieces and just work on music that I enjoy. So right now I don't think I can put up with this type of challenge, sorry...
I wanted to ask something about the competition. I was thinking about posting recordings from my exams, and like I said, one of my exam pieces was also the competition piece (Tchaikovsky - Op. 39 No. 21 -Sweet Reverie). So is it better that I don't post it now till the competition is over?
someone will play it so well that you'll see how nice it can sound
I think if you want to post to the audition room now that's fine.. but if you do (particularly with the Tchaikovsky).. make a new one of the same piece for the competition.. maybe you can use comments from the audition room to help you develop your performance a little in time for our competition?Or you can share it as part of the discussion thread on the fixed work which I'll be starting very soon.. so long as what ever goes into the competition is a rendition that we haven't heard yet.
OK.. So in-line with what j_menz suggested, I'm going to just decide. And, in line with what lloyd_cdb has suggested if no one likes it too bad, this is just a test run to see how it works I suppose.Decided....Tchaikovsky ...
just want folks to be clear. you mean pete. not keanu!
couldnt keanu use the matrix to be whoever.. they may actually be one and the same person.
Oh well maybe you will next time and maybe you'll even start to like this piece if you'll listen to the competition recordings or videos and someone will play it so well that you'll see how nice it can sound But if there's anything I can do just tell me you made me really happy when you offered to be my manager and to pay for me!!!! it really means a lot! So thanks again!
I also strongly considered mozart K453a (sorrow march) - maybe keypeg would've liked that one better? Either way, if there's a next time and I'm the decision maker again then the fixed piece will be at a contrast to this one.
P.S. Is it mandatory that the second piece is included in the list you mentioned? Shostakovich is not included there...
That sounds like a lot of fun! What about the sucky bracket though... are there enough people who aren't elite as hell at piano (my maximum skill is probably... invention 1ish right now, and I can't play it perfect). Also, how would this work, couldn't you just keep rerecording till you get something good? Is that okay?edit: didn't read the second page, whoops! I still think it would be fun, but... my I'm going to be severely outclassed by the people who are really good here. Also, is the camcorder mandatory now?
The goal is to boost participation, but this is really hard to judge.. I picked a piece that was suited to the majority of the people that showed an interest in this thread but that would not be out of reach of many lower level students if they want to make the effort. ...That piece is meant to be easy enough but also hard enough. The majority of the piece the control between voices is in separate hands, the quiet accompaniment is off the beat and in the hand opposite to the leading melody - meaning you are very rarely/never expected to anything like varied dynamics within one hand at one time in order to produce something satisfactory. The notes are easy enough so the main challenge will be bringing out the top and bottom voices at the appropriate times/sections. I'm also hoping that most people will actively discuss how to achieve this over the next 6-7 weeks in a "project" type thread. I appreciate that it may not work for everyone, but in my experience playing with people better than oneself lifts your own standard, the idea is to give an intermediate level person something to work at that will make them a better pianist, and make it worth an advanced person leaning the work because there is room in this piece to really make something of it...and for those with less skill to see the differences between them and someone else, to get to make those comparisons about complex musical elements and talk about it with people who have all learnt the same piece, some of who can play it really really well.
Then the last two days there have been these posts saying that the point is winning, that the part that is interesting is who wins, and who is "the best".
This is the type of thing that motivated me to be part of this:These things are friendly and inclusive. We collectively help each other and learn, while individually we have a chance to grow and discover. This is why I joined. The idea that the main interest is in who wins is cold and empty in comparison.
If any of my posts have given you the impression I am in this camp, let me just say my tongue has been firmly planted in my cheek every time.
I've been curious about this whole competition scenario. When I first joined forums, it seemed tThis is the type of thing that motivated me to be part of this:These things are friendly and inclusive. We collectively help each other and learn, while individually we have a chance to grow and discover. This is why I joined. The idea that the main interest is in who wins is cold and empty in comparison.