I don't support Trump, and I'm too young to support him anyways, but the reason I'd prefer him over Hillary Clinton is that I don't want a war with Russia or China.
You think someone who
sued the Onion over a joke article is going to be better at negotiation and have more experience than a woman who, aside from having a degree in law from Yale, served as Secretary of State for 8 years?
Clinton seems like she wants to fight Russia and China (especially China). If we do fight, there will be a draft, and there will be tremendous losses (needless to say.)
On what basis do you make this assumption? When has HRC said anything about going to war with them? On the contrary, Trump goes after China all the time and is far more aggressive to them than Hillary is.
There will have probably not any major benefits to any side. Trump seems more inclined to negotiation (especially with Russia), for which some of the Clinton-backers make fun of him for. (I saw that they write things such as "Trump kisses Putin's ass".)
Again, I pose to you. How does someone who
sued Bill Maher for making a joke have any qualifications when it comes to talking things out? The simple fact is that he's a thin skinned narcissist. After the DNC, he said he "wanted to hit those speakers [of the DNC]" because they said mean things about him.
He's literally a child.
Also, since I am part Asian, I would be worse off under Clinton's rule, even without war; as President, she has the power to appoint a Supreme Court justice who will make the college quota for Asians even lower than it is now.
Firstly, the SCOTUS hardly has much say in such a case; higher education is handled almost exclusively at the state level. Second, I highly doubt that, were the Supreme Court to rule on such a minor issue, that it would either a) rule in the direction which you do not like or b) actually be that big of a change.
The White majority will also be at loss (a smaller one though); some of our chances for college will be given to the Hispanic and Black minority (even though most colleges already are far more lenient to them than Asians.)
If you think the white majority (which is under no attack, no matter what Fox News might have you believe) is going to suffer because of HRC, please read a book. Or her platform, honestly. You will find no evidence of Hillary Clinton being discriminatory against whites, nor trying to give other races an unfair advantage over whites (as Affirmative Action plans aren't that in the slightest).
As you know, I have yet to go to college,
Ahh, there it is.
so this would affect my life tremendously, for I am neither Black or Hispanic.
I hardly think that one SC Ruling would really change your life that much. In addition, if that's all you're worried about with HRC, you're against her for all the wrong reasons.
There are many reasons to be against Hillary Clinton. Some include:
- Her terrible voting record
- Horrible foreign policy experience and ideas (Donald Trump is no better, except that he has no experience of any kind)
- Wall Street and big business connections (Shared by Trump; he's in with these guys just as much as Clinton is)
- Lack of willingness to take important steps for the environment, such as banning fracking and/or giving subsidies to alternate energy companies (Trump is even worse, as he thinks climate change is a Chinese hoax)
- The fact that she's only progressive when convenient to her; she voted against gay marriage, called black people "super predators", among other things. (Trump has stated and proposed far worse TODAY, as opposed to in the past).
With all due respect, actually give their platforms a read before saying things that simply aren't true.
Best,
Harrison